Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964982AbXBEWeA (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:34:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964937AbXBEWeA (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:34:00 -0500 Received: from raven.upol.cz ([158.194.120.4]:46188 "EHLO raven.upol.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964982AbXBEWd7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:33:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 23:42:35 +0100 To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Alan , Allen Martin , linux-kernel , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: Nvidia cable detection problems & ACPI (beware, slight off-top) Message-ID: <20070205224235.GB28048@flower.upol.cz> References: <45C72012.7050605@gmail.com> <20070205132247.6f611e3c@localhost.localdomain> <45C73A3E.6080700@gmail.com> <20070205143439.6962c076@localhost.localdomain> <45C7444F.4070500@gmail.com> <58cb370e0702050709w1b7682dr5dff9e7ce69465a@mail.gmail.com> <20070205220442.6e13a7b6@localhost.localdomain> <45C7A7D0.407@garzik.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45C7A7D0.407@garzik.org> Organization: Palacky University in Olomouc, experimental physics department. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Oleg Verych Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1805 Lines: 45 (i don't know a single bit of details of what i'm writing, so... ;) Jeff Garzik wrote: > Alan wrote: > >>I'm very upset, that hardware nvidia-lego forces system software (and > >>programmers) to know "unfortunately no standard" ways of desinging > >>things... One read-only-for-os, hardware set bit in kind of control > > > >The hardware doesn't. The BIOS authors do by not setting the cable flags. > >We actually need to use the STM and GTM methods for PC suspend/resume so > >it makes sense to see if they will work out in this case too. Before that. I mean, to let Vendor to choose (and software operate) GPIO and then to have headache, you've described. Also, here i'm not going wider, than hardware cabel detection/max speed test (IMHO it must be pretty easy). > We also need ACPI, where available, because that's the only way to > obtain a BIOS-set hard drive password. Plain-text passwords -- i don't actually know, if they are useful at all. What if BIOS has admin/user passwords set? (kernel: if you have BIOS password, press RESET; if you don't press POWER ;) > And BIOS vendors often deliver hard drive-specific errata this way, if > the problem is serious enough (though certainly we would prefer that > the OS knows about drive errata, when a runtime patch is necessary) I thought versions, revisions, stepping are indicators of that, and OS have workarounds, fixes, optimizations, based on that kind of information. "BIOS vendors", as i read here, are IMHO -bug-in-the-middle- attack (: Kind regards, guys. -- -o--=O`C #oo'L O <___=E M - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/