Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752744AbXBFFUT (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 00:20:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752763AbXBFFUS (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 00:20:18 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.191]:2917 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752744AbXBFFUQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 00:20:16 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UBID7PAXT7Dxf2y3B+YuwRawUAoFESSRCbRIgzAcPo2jzS0BpC6o97r5PfYbi3npjFpVcduYjLr9JV6/KguB13EyzGZHuj8gw3ZV0Wo7yne/tqDakxL39TmFvUp1f/dnk//A67kamGUHB6VwtoLptOlWCZftBFV2CX4hY7gCoEc= Message-ID: <1a297b360702052120x10f15b4cicaa867573d0210b9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:20:15 +0400 From: "Manu Abraham" To: "Grant Grundler" Subject: Re: 2.6.20 PCI Cannot allocate resource region 2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, greg@kroah.com, "Andrew Morton" In-Reply-To: <20070206045528.GA4228@colo.lackof.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1a297b360702041709l3b0309c7y8fcd33df1d487889@mail.gmail.com> <20070206045528.GA4228@colo.lackof.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3890 Lines: 99 On 2/6/07, Grant Grundler wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:09:01AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I get this error on booting up 2.6.20 (Similar error on 2.6.17.7 also, > > the message is slightly different in 2.6.17.7) > > > > PCI Cannot allocate resource region 2 of device 0000:02:0a.0 > > PCI Error while updating region 000:02:0a.0/5 (f3e00004 != 0200) > > PCI Error while updating region 000:02:0a.0/5 (high 00000000 != 4e351) > > ... > > The last 2 devices are Rev 1 chips, whereas the one which is acting a > > bit strange is a newer version from the same vendor. > > > Any ideas as to why it could not allocate the region ? > > Looks like the HW is broken. ah, was thinking about this. :-) > This bridge: > > > 00:1e.0 0604: 8086:244e (rev c2) > > Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- > > Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- > Latency: 0 > > Bus: primary=00, secondary=02, subordinate=02, sec-latency=64 > > I/O behind bridge: 0000d000-0000dfff > > Memory behind bridge: f3e00000-f7efffff > > Prefetchable memory behind bridge: e9b00000-e9bfffff > > Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- > BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR+ NoISA- VGA- MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B- > > will only route 0xf3e... to 0xf7efff... > The attempt to assign f3e00004 is just trying to put a valid value in the BAR. > So I think linux is _trying_ to DTRT. > > > 02:0a.0 4e35: 1800:4e35 (rev 08) (prog-if 18) > > Subsystem: 002c:c200 > > Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- > > Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR+ > Latency: 0, Cache Line Size 0c > > BIST is running > > BIST is required to complete in 2 seconds. Either with success or failure. > I expect BIOS to have complained before launching grub/lilo. BIOS didn't say anything at all. > You might look for that on the next reboot and if possible use a > serial console to log all output or look for BIOS warnings or > logged "events". > But all bets are off regarding programming the device as > long as BIST is running. The only PCI requirement is the device > not interfere with "operation of other devices on the bus". > BIST is supposed to terminate before, say the OS kernel is loaded ? or does it mean that it can keep running still ? > > > Region 0: Memory at f7ee0000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=4K] > > Region 2: Memory at e9b00000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [disabled] [size=4K] > > Region 3: Memory at (32-bit, prefetchable) [disabled] > > Region 4: Memory at (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] > > Region 5: Memory at (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] > > This is obviously garbage. 64-bit registers can only be represented with > two consecutive "BAR" and region 5 is the last one. > There is no way this can be a 64-bit BAR. > Generally, 64-bit BARs start on an "even" numbered BAR (but I've forgotten > again if that's just convention or a requirement) > was just wondering how it could be a 64 bit device. > hth, > grant > Thanks a lot for the valuable info. I had not ruled out the option that it could be broken. I will try the device in the other OS also, to confirm this. Will post the status after that. But most probably as you said, could be broken. Thanks, Manu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/