Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751717AbXBFJIG (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 04:08:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751771AbXBFJIG (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 04:08:06 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:39449 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751728AbXBFJIE (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 04:08:04 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] VMI / Paravirt bugfixes for 2.6.21 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Rusty Russell Cc: Zachary Amsden , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Chris Wright In-Reply-To: <1170738676.29293.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200702060352.l163q87K000713@zach-dev.vmware.com> <1170736029.29293.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45C809F9.2090905@vmware.com> <1170738676.29293.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:07:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1170752856.7324.5.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-3.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1115 Lines: 26 On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 16:11 +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 20:54 -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote: > > Rusty Russell wrote: > > > Indeed, I'm expecting to push lguest this week, and this code will > > > effect me, so I'd like to see this in a -mm soon... > > > > Yes, I took a look at the lguest changes today and I think these won't > > generate conflicts, just make stuff easier for you ;) Course you've now > > got a couple new paravirt-ops to support, but the native ones are fine > > for temporary use. > > Implementing stolen time is something I'd like to do, since it'd be a > nice self-contained example the expectations. hmm stolen time could even be useful without virtualization; to a large degree, if cpufreq reduces the speed of your cpu you have "stolen cycles" that way... I wonder if this concept can be used for that as well... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/