Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 13:16:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 13:16:16 -0500 Received: from xdsl-213-168-106-33.netcologne.de ([213.168.106.33]:19807 "EHLO ecce.homeip.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 13:16:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 18:15:38 +0001 (UTC) From: Thorsten Glaser To: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Which gcc version? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dixitur de M. Edward (Ed) Borasky respondebo ad: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, [ISO-8859-1] Ra?l[ISO-8859-1] N??ez de Arenas Coronado wrote: > > > Sooner or later the kernel will need to be ported to gcc 3.x > > series, so, the sooner it gets tested with this compiler, the better. > > One of the regression tests for gcc is to compile *a* Linux kernel, although > I have no clue which kernel they use, or if they just haul down the latest one > from the Internet. It's one of the 2.2 series IIRC. Go http://gcc.gnu.org/ > > Anyway, if you have gcc 2.95.x installed onto your distro, use > > that for the kernel for maximum stability. I've run 2.4.3-ac7 plus andrea's rwsem, compiled on a gcc-3 beta of April 2001, since then (not in 24/7 though) with _no_ problems. -mirabilos -- | This message body is covered by Germanic and International | OpenBSD30 | Copyright law. Modification of any kind and redistribution | centericq | via AOL or the Microsoft network are strictly prohibited!! | UIN seems | Scientific-style quotation permitted if due credits given. | 132315236 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/