Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu) by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 14:49:40 -0400 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 14:47:41 -0400 Received: from [194.25.81.131] ([194.25.81.131]:3835 "EHLO ns.weiden.de") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 14:47:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 22:06:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Mike Galbraith To: "Richard B. Johnson" Cc: Kai Henningsen , linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: RLIM_INFINITY inconsistency between archs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Content-Length: 1273 Lines: 36 On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > On 31 Jul 2000, Kai Henningsen wrote: > > > pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil (Jesse Pollard) wrote on 27.07.00 in <200007271531.KAA89926@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>: > > > > > Might I suggest creating a "/lib/include" that works something like > > > the /lib/modules where the kernel name is used to generate the directory > > > for the kernel include files? > > > > > > That way the "uname -r" command could be used to set a symbolic link > > > to point to the correct include files at boot time (or install time). > > > > Correct for what? > > > Why would anybody change this? I fear that this is another of those; > "It doesn't have to be better, only different..." things that have > been going around. Well, I suspect that there is an issue for driver authors/maintainers, but haven't figured out quite what that issue is. Why does it matter? I really couldn't care less where headers officially live.. as long as it's possiblle [preferably easy] to maintain them where _I_ want them. (and that is nowhere near /) -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/