Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 13:56:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 13:56:33 -0500 Received: from green.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.57]:36604 "EHLO green.csi.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 13:56:16 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011123185333.00afd920@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 18:56:07 +0000 To: Daniel Phillips From: Anton Altaparmakov Subject: Re: Which gcc version? Cc: war , Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011123135801.00aad970@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <20011123125137Z282133-17408+17815@vger.kernel.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20011123135801.00aad970@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 18:30 23/11/01, Daniel Phillips wrote: >On November 23, 2001 02:59 pm, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > At 13:51 23/11/01, war wrote: > > >You should use gcc-2.95.3. > > > > That's not true. gcc-2.96 as provided with RedHat 7.2 is perfectly fine. > > > > gcc-3x OTOH is not a good idea at the moment. > >Do you have any particular reason for saying that? I haven't done any measurements myself but from what I have read, gcc-3.x produces significantly slower code than gcc-2.96. I know I should try myself some time... but if that is indeed true that is a very good reason to stick with gcc-2.96. Anton -- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown -- Anton Altaparmakov (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ ICQ: 8561279 / WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/