Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
        Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc:     iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] iommu/sva: Assign a PASID to mm on PASID
 allocation and free it on mm exit
In-Reply-To: <87ee4w6g1n.ffs@tglx>
References: <20211217220136.2762116-1-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
 <20211217220136.2762116-6-fenghua.yu@intel.com> <87ee4w6g1n.ffs@tglx>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 21:36:00 +0100
Message-ID: <87bl006fdb.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 24 2022 at 21:21, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Hrm. This is odd.
>
>> +/* Associate a PASID with an mm_struct: */
>> +static inline void mm_pasid_get(struct mm_struct *mm, u32 pasid)
>> +{
>> +	mm->pasid = pasid;
>> +}
>
> This does not get anything. It sets the allocated PASID in the mm. The
> refcount on the PASID was already taken by the allocation. So this
> should be mm_pasid_set() or mm_pasid_install(), right?

And as a result of all this ioasid_get() is now left without users...

Thanks,

        tglx