Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 0596/1039] rtw89: fix potentially access out of range of RF register array
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:39:45 +0100
Message-Id: <20220124184145.369990067@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220124184125.121143506@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20220124184125.121143506@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>

[ Upstream commit 30101812a09b37bc8aa409a83f603d4c072198f2 ]

The RF register array is used to help firmware to restore RF settings.
The original code can potentially access out of range, if the size is
between (RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_SIZE * RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_NUM + 1) to
((RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_SIZE + 1) * RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_NUM). Fortunately,
current used size doesn't fall into the wrong case, and the size will not
change if we don't update RF parameter.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211119055729.12826-1-pkshih@realtek.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c | 33 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
index ab134856baac7..d75e9de8df7c6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
@@ -654,6 +654,12 @@ rtw89_phy_cofig_rf_reg_store(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 	u16 idx = info->curr_idx % RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_SIZE;
 	u8 page = info->curr_idx / RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_SIZE;
 
+	if (page >= RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_NUM) {
+		rtw89_warn(rtwdev, "RF parameters exceed size. path=%d, idx=%d",
+			   rf_path, info->curr_idx);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	info->rtw89_phy_config_rf_h2c[page][idx] =
 		cpu_to_le32((reg->addr << 20) | reg->data);
 	info->curr_idx++;
@@ -662,30 +668,29 @@ rtw89_phy_cofig_rf_reg_store(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 static int rtw89_phy_config_rf_reg_fw(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 				      struct rtw89_fw_h2c_rf_reg_info *info)
 {
-	u16 page = info->curr_idx / RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_SIZE;
-	u16 len = (info->curr_idx % RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_SIZE) * 4;
+	u16 remain = info->curr_idx;
+	u16 len = 0;
 	u8 i;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (page > RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_NUM) {
+	if (remain > RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_NUM * RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_SIZE) {
 		rtw89_warn(rtwdev,
-			   "rf reg h2c total page num %d larger than %d (RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_NUM)\n",
-			   page, RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_NUM);
-		return -EINVAL;
+			   "rf reg h2c total len %d larger than %d\n",
+			   remain, RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_NUM * RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_SIZE);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < page; i++) {
-		ret = rtw89_fw_h2c_rf_reg(rtwdev, info,
-					  RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_SIZE * 4, i);
+	for (i = 0; i < RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_NUM && remain; i++, remain -= len) {
+		len = remain > RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_SIZE ? RTW89_H2C_RF_PAGE_SIZE : remain;
+		ret = rtw89_fw_h2c_rf_reg(rtwdev, info, len * 4, i);
 		if (ret)
-			return ret;
+			goto out;
 	}
-	ret = rtw89_fw_h2c_rf_reg(rtwdev, info, len, i);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+out:
 	info->curr_idx = 0;
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void rtw89_phy_config_rf_reg(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
-- 
2.34.1