Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:46:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:46:34 -0500 Received: from cc361913-a.flrtn1.occa.home.com ([24.0.193.171]:45189 "EHLO mirai.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:46:00 -0500 Message-ID: <3BFEA76F.3FA487A6@pobox.com> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 11:45:51 -0800 From: J Sloan Organization: J S Concepts X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.15-pre9 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: gcc vs intel's cc In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > hi all > > have anyone tried Intel's commercial compiler and tried to compare the > results with gcc? yes and no. The intel compiler has shown better performance for userspace programs - however it is incapable of compiling the kernel. cu jjs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/