Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030563AbXBFX1l (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 18:27:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030567AbXBFX1l (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 18:27:41 -0500 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:56472 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030563AbXBFX1k (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 18:27:40 -0500 From: Neil Brown To: "Kai" , Andrew Morton , stable@suse.de, org@suse.de Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:26:56 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17865.3776.511594.763544@notabene.brown> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe Subject: [PATCH] Re: Bio device too big | kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:537! In-Reply-To: message from Neil Brown on Tuesday February 6 References: <1170734919.15636.1173102761@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20070205203750.7be7f772.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <17864.4339.925700.626157@notabene.brown> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 X-face: [Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D > This patch should fix the worst of the offences, but I'd like to > experiment and think a bit more before I submit it to stable. > And probably test it too - as yet I have only compile and brain > tested. Ok, I've experimented and tested and now I know what was causing the double-unlock. The following patch is suitable for 2.6.20.1 and mainline. There is room for a bit more improvement, but only for performance, not correctness. I'll look into that later. Thanks, NeilBrown ------------------------------------ Fix various bugs with aligned reads in RAID5. It is possible for raid5 to be sent a bio that is too big for an underlying device. So if it is a READ that we pass stright down to a device, it will fail and confuse RAID5. So in 'chunk_aligned_read' we check that the bio fits within the parameters for the target device and if it doesn't fit, fall back on reading through the stripe cache and making lots of one-page requests. Note that this is the earliest time we can check against the device because earlier we don't have a lock on the device, so it could change underneath us. Also, the code for handling a retry through the cache when a read fails has not been tested and was badly broken. This patch fixes that code. Signed-off-by: Neil Brown ### Diffstat output ./drivers/md/raid5.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff .prev/drivers/md/raid5.c ./drivers/md/raid5.c --- .prev/drivers/md/raid5.c 2007-02-02 14:17:55.000000000 +1100 +++ ./drivers/md/raid5.c 2007-02-06 19:19:01.000000000 +1100 @@ -2570,7 +2570,7 @@ static struct bio *remove_bio_from_retry } bi = conf->retry_read_aligned_list; if(bi) { - conf->retry_read_aligned = bi->bi_next; + conf->retry_read_aligned_list = bi->bi_next; bi->bi_next = NULL; bi->bi_phys_segments = 1; /* biased count of active stripes */ bi->bi_hw_segments = 0; /* count of processed stripes */ @@ -2619,6 +2619,27 @@ static int raid5_align_endio(struct bio return 0; } +static int bio_fits_rdev(struct bio *bi) +{ + request_queue_t *q = bdev_get_queue(bi->bi_bdev); + + if ((bi->bi_size>>9) > q->max_sectors) + return 0; + blk_recount_segments(q, bi); + if (bi->bi_phys_segments > q->max_phys_segments || + bi->bi_hw_segments > q->max_hw_segments) + return 0; + + if (q->merge_bvec_fn) + /* it's too hard to apply the merge_bvec_fn at this stage, + * just just give up + */ + return 0; + + return 1; +} + + static int chunk_aligned_read(request_queue_t *q, struct bio * raid_bio) { mddev_t *mddev = q->queuedata; @@ -2665,6 +2686,13 @@ static int chunk_aligned_read(request_qu align_bi->bi_flags &= ~(1 << BIO_SEG_VALID); align_bi->bi_sector += rdev->data_offset; + if (!bio_fits_rdev(align_bi)) { + /* too big in some way */ + bio_put(align_bi); + rdev_dec_pending(rdev, mddev); + return 0; + } + spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock); wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_for_stripe, conf->quiesce == 0, @@ -3055,7 +3083,9 @@ static int retry_aligned_read(raid5_con last_sector = raid_bio->bi_sector + (raid_bio->bi_size>>9); for (; logical_sector < last_sector; - logical_sector += STRIPE_SECTORS, scnt++) { + logical_sector += STRIPE_SECTORS, + sector += STRIPE_SECTORS, + scnt++) { if (scnt < raid_bio->bi_hw_segments) /* already done this stripe */ @@ -3071,7 +3101,13 @@ static int retry_aligned_read(raid5_con } set_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[dd_idx].flags); - add_stripe_bio(sh, raid_bio, dd_idx, 0); + if (!add_stripe_bio(sh, raid_bio, dd_idx, 0)) { + release_stripe(sh); + raid_bio->bi_hw_segments = scnt; + conf->retry_read_aligned = raid_bio; + return handled; + } + handle_stripe(sh, NULL); release_stripe(sh); handled++; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/