Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 15:01:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 15:01:31 -0500 Received: from lilly.ping.de ([62.72.90.2]:55558 "HELO lilly.ping.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 15:01:20 -0500 Date: 23 Nov 2001 21:00:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20011123210011.A487@planetzork.spacenet> From: jogi@planetzork.ping.de To: "Linus Torvalds" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.4.15: results of kernel compilation bench In-Reply-To: <20011104192725.A847@planetzork.spacenet> <20011105084633.A32243@planetzork.spacenet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <20011105084633.A32243@planetzork.spacenet>; from jogi on Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 08:46:33AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, here are the results of my parallel kernel compilation benchmark for 2.4.15-pre7, 2.4.15-pre7aa1 and 2.4.15. The old results are included for reference: j25 j50 j75 j100 2.4.13-pre5aa1: 5:02.63 5:09.18 5:26.27 5:34.36 2.4.13-pre5aa1: 4:58.80 5:12.30 5:26.23 5:32.14 2.4.13-pre5aa1: 4:57.66 5:11.29 5:45.90 6:03.53 2.4.13-pre5aa1: 4:58.39 5:13.10 5:29.32 5:44.49 2.4.13-pre5aa1: 4:57.93 5:09.76 5:24.76 5:26.79 2.4.14-pre6: 4:58.88 5:16.68 5:45.93 7:16.56 2.4.14-pre6: 4:55.72 5:34.65 5:57.94 6:50.58 2.4.14-pre6: 4:59.46 5:16.88 6:25.83 6:51.43 2.4.14-pre6: 4:56.38 5:18.88 6:15.97 6:31.72 2.4.14-pre6: 4:55.79 5:17.47 6:00.23 6:44.85 2.4.14-pre7: 4:56.39 5:22.84 6:09.05 9:56.59 2.4.14-pre7: 4:56.55 5:25.15 7:01.37 7:03.74 2.4.14-pre7: 4:59.44 5:15.10 6:06.78 12:51.39* 2.4.14-pre7: 4:58.07 5:30.55 6:15.37 * 2.4.14-pre7: 4:58.17 5:26.80 6:41.44 * 2.4.14-pre8: 4:57.14 5:10.72 5:54.42 6:37.39 2.4.14-pre8: 4:59.57 5:11.63 6:34.97 11:23.77 2.4.14-pre8: 4:58.18 5:16.67 6:07.88 6:32.38 2.4.14-pre8: 4:56.23 5:16.57 6:15.01 7:02.45 2.4.14-pre8: 4:58.53 5:19.98 5:39.09 12:08.69 2.4.14-pre8vmscan2: 5:01.64 5:12.03 6:08.62 6:19.32 2.4.14-pre8vmscan2: 4:56.70 5:15.50 6:17.80 6:50.60 2.4.14-pre8vmscan2: 4:56.86 5:14.12 6:02.09 6:16.18 2.4.14-pre8vmscan2: 4:59.43 5:18.02 5:58.50 6:16.87 2.4.14-pre8vmscan2: 4:56.75 5:17.18 5:52.73 6:15.04 2.4.15-pre7: 4:57.45 5:09.25 6:13.70 6:01.78 2.4.15-pre7: 4:57.21 5:13.46 5:50.80 5:53.45 2.4.15-pre7: 4:54.31 5:14.19 5:57.90 6:36.95 2.4.15-pre7: 4:56.50 5:16.22 5:25.88 6:10.21 2.4.15-pre7: 4:56.49 5:16.89 5:39.14 6:09.24 2.4.15-pre7aa1: 4:56.01 5:05.83 5:26.82 5:29.45 2.4.15-pre7aa1: 4:54.33 5:09.11 5:26.04 10:06.2 2.4.15-pre7aa1: 4:52.63 5:06.34 5:46.49 5:55.70 2.4.15-pre7aa1: 4:56.01 5:05.26 5:24.36 6:09.84 2.4.15-pre7aa1: 4:52.92 5:05.31 5:52.71 5:48.47 2.4.15-greased-turkey: 4:57.23 5:15.64 7:05.20 7:44.06 2.4.15-greased-turkey: 4:55.74 5:23.00 7:14.78 12:47.08* 2.4.15-greased-turkey: 4:56.78 5:21.90 6:27.78 * 2.4.15-greased-turkey: 4:56.68 5:17.78 6:24.33 * 2.4.15-greased-turkey: 5:00.65 5:20.16 6:52.77 * * These builds did not complete because processes were killed by the OOM killer. If I have a look at the changelog I see no VM changes anymore so I am wondering why 2.4.15 is not as good as -pre7 was ... If you want me to test any patches just let me know. Kind regards, Jogi -- Well, yeah ... I suppose there's no point in getting greedy, is there? << Calvin & Hobbes >> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/