Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH REPOST 0/8] kernel/fork: Move thread stack free otu of the scheduler path.
Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:26:44 +0100
Message-Id: <20220125152652.1963111-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

[ This is a repost of https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211118143452.136421-1-big=
easy@linutronix.de ]

This is a follup-up on the patch
    sched: Delay task stack freeing on RT=20
    https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210928122411.593486363@linutronix.de

It addresses the review feedback:
- Decouple stack accounting from its free invocation. The accounting
  happens in do_exit(), the final free call happens later.

- Add put_task_stack_sched() to finish_task_switch(). Here the VMAP
  stack is cached only. If it fails, or in the !VMAP case then the final
  free happens in delayed_put_task_struct(). This is also an oportunity
  to cache the stack.

From testing I observe the following:

|            bash-1715    [006] .....   124.901510: copy_process: allocC ff=
ffc90007e70000
|      sh-cmds.sh-1746    [007] .....   124.907389: copy_process: allocC ff=
ffc90007dc4000
|          <idle>-0       [019] ...1.   124.918126: free_thread_stack: cach=
e ffffc90007dc4000
|      sh-cmds.sh-1746    [007] .....   124.918279: copy_process: allocC ff=
ffc90007de8000
|          <idle>-0       [004] ...1.   124.920121: free_thread_stack: dela=
y ffffc90007de8001
|          <idle>-0       [007] ...1.   124.920299: free_thread_stack: cach=
e ffffc90007e70000
|          <idle>-0       [007] ..s1.   124.945433: free_thread_stack: cach=
e ffffc90007de8000

TS 124.901510, bash started sh-cmds.sh, obtained stack from cache.
TS 124.907389, script invokes its first command, obtained stacak from
cache. As you can see bash was running on CPU6 but its child was moved
CPU7.=20
TS 124.918126, the first command is done, stack is ached on CPU19.
TS 124.918279, script's second command, ache from stack.
TS 124.920121, the command is done. The stack cache on CPU4 is full.
TS 124.920299, the script is done, caches stack on CPU7.
TS 124.945433, the RCU-callback of last command is now happening. On
CPU7, which is where the command was invoked (but not running). Instead
of freeing the stack, it was cached since CPU7 had an empty slot.

If I pin the script to CPU5 and run it with multiple commands then it
works as expected:

|            bash-1799    [005] .....   993.608131: copy_process: allocC ff=
ffc90007fa0000
|      sh-cmds.sh-1827    [005] .....   993.608888: copy_process: allocC ff=
ffc90007fa8000
|      sh-cmds.sh-1827    [005] .....   993.610734: copy_process: allocV ff=
ffc90007ff4000
|      sh-cmds.sh-1829    [005] ...1.   993.610757: free_thread_stack: cach=
e ffffc90007fa8000
|      sh-cmds.sh-1827    [005] .....   993.612401: copy_process: allocC ff=
ffc90007fa8000
|           <...>-1830    [005] ...1.   993.612416: free_thread_stack: cach=
e ffffc90007ff4000
|      sh-cmds.sh-1827    [005] .....   993.613707: copy_process: allocC ff=
ffc90007ff4000
|      sh-cmds.sh-1831    [005] ...1.   993.613723: free_thread_stack: cach=
e ffffc90007fa8000
|      sh-cmds.sh-1827    [005] .....   993.615024: copy_process: allocC ff=
ffc90007fa8000
|           <...>-1832    [005] ...1.   993.615040: free_thread_stack: cach=
e ffffc90007ff4000
|      sh-cmds.sh-1827    [005] .....   993.616380: copy_process: allocC ff=
ffc90007ff4000
|           <...>-1833    [005] ...1.   993.616397: free_thread_stack: cach=
e ffffc90007fa8000
|            bash-1799    [005] ...1.   993.617759: free_thread_stack: cach=
e ffffc90007fa0000
|          <idle>-0       [005] ...1.   993.617871: free_thread_stack: dela=
y ffffc90007ff4001
|          <idle>-0       [005] ..s1.   993.638311: free_thread_stack: free=
 ffffc90007ff4000

and no new is allocated during its runtime and a cached stack is used.

Sebastian