Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 15:24:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 15:24:34 -0500 Received: from green.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.57]:24710 "EHLO green.csi.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 15:24:16 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011123201824.05610ec0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 20:24:16 +0000 To: Andrew Morton From: Anton Altaparmakov Subject: Re: Which gcc version? Cc: Daniel Phillips , war , Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3BFEAE22.1CE8DE5B@zip.com.au> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011123135801.00aad970@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <5.1.0.14.2.20011123185333.00afd920@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <5.1.0.14.2.20011123185333.00afd920@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrew, At 20:14 23/11/01, Andrew Morton wrote: >Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > If there is a performance hit, it's not enough to worry about. > >except egcs-1.1.2 (2.91.6) compiles stuff at almost twice the speed >of gcc3. The person who breaks egcs-1.1.2 for kernel builds owes >me a quad Xeon, thanks very much. Have you read the current Documentation/Changes? It says "the 2.5 tree is likely to drop egcs-1.1.2 workarounds". Whoever wrote that seems to be wanting to break it in the near future... Anton -- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown -- Anton Altaparmakov (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ ICQ: 8561279 / WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/