Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161085AbXBGIEs (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 03:04:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161097AbXBGIEr (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 03:04:47 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:51190 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161085AbXBGIEr (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 03:04:47 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 00:04:41 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com, clameter@engr.sgi.com, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node In-Reply-To: <20070207101400.feda1bf9.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20070206202312.4f979bcf.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20070207101400.feda1bf9.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 782 Lines: 21 On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > Hmmm... Remove the node from the node_online_map instead? > > > Changing defintion of node_online_map is harmfil. (there are cpu-only-nodes.) > How about adding nodemask for nodes equips memory ? Ok that is better but... Would it be possible to attach the cpus to the next nodes with memory and mark the node offline? That way we could avoid another mask that we constantly have to check? Or fix the location where the error occurred to be able to tolerate a node with no zones? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/