Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200203053650.8923-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
 <CAHbLzkoUmhPbnt=yMfBSFs2G6r2S5ggD6AkYQvg0zxBAqQK2fA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220125093702.3ffdb721@gandalf.local.home> <20220125093846.59826cad@gandalf.local.home>
 <CAHbLzkq51-_Rxj0YyWR4qxQRzosvP2Tj6D52=OtCZUG_mydDBQ@mail.gmail.com> <20220125150352.147d3c58@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20220125150352.147d3c58@gandalf.local.home>
From:   Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:19:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkrkvcnfxQqrAJosLZK_jOxErwGvn5VkLASNfut6_N-+0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3] block: introduce block_rq_error tracepoint
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 12:03 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 11:58:10 -0800
> Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Never mind. Other than the code restructure, I also found some data
> > structure (struct request) and function (blk_fill_rwbs) change. I
> > think I'd better rebase the patch to 5.17-rc1 then resubmit it. Since
> > there is no fundamental change to the patch, can I keep your
> > reviewed-by tag?
>
> Sure, but please Cc me.

Yeah, definitely. Thanks.

>
> -- Steve