Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030612AbXBGJUL (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 04:20:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030609AbXBGJUL (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 04:20:11 -0500 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:53796 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030610AbXBGJUI (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 04:20:08 -0500 To: Christoph Lameter Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com, clameter@engr.sgi.com, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node References: <20070206202312.4f979bcf.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20070207101400.feda1bf9.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> From: Andi Kleen Date: 07 Feb 2007 11:20:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 547 Lines: 10 Christoph Lameter writes: > > Would it be possible to attach the cpus to the > next nodes with memory and mark the node offline? That way we could avoid > another mask that we constantly have to check? That is what x86-64 does and I believe is the right solution to this. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/