Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S282256AbRKWV4D>; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 16:56:03 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S282255AbRKWVzx>; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 16:55:53 -0500
Received: from cc361913-a.flrtn1.occa.home.com ([24.0.193.171]:47751 "EHLO
	mirai.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S282261AbRKWVzl>;
	Fri, 23 Nov 2001 16:55:41 -0500
Message-ID: <3BFEC5DA.ADDDF1BD@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 13:55:38 -0800
From: J Sloan <jjs@pobox.com>
Organization: J S Concepts
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.15-pre9 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Jasen <jjasen1@umbc.edu>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Which gcc version?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.31L.02.0111231532000.13038141-100000@irix2.gl.umbc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

John Jasen wrote:

> Their first cut at a released 2.96 should never have made it out of the
> labs alive, and for that matter, neither should have 7.0.

Mistakes are made by all - redhat fixed theirs,
that's good enough for me.

> That said, the versions in 7.1, and the patches available have done
> reasonably well for everything that I've tried to compile (kernels
> included).

indeed -

> What are they going to do about gcc 3.0.x? It'll be amusing to watch.

Not sure you mean "what are they going to do"
since gcc 3.0.x is included in redhat 7.2 - could
you explain about the amusing part?

;-)

cu

jjs


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/