Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   tangmeng <tangmeng@uniontech.com>
To:     axboe@kernel.dk, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     tangmeng <tangmeng@uniontech.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] scsi: sr: Improve the judgment statement
Date:   Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:11:36 +0800
Message-Id: <20220127091136.9658-1-tangmeng@uniontech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:uniontech.com:qybgforeign:qybgforeign7
Precedence: bulk

The previous code has a less-than-perfect usage of judgment syntax.

When the med->media_event_code value is equal to 2 or 3, the same
value is returned, so it would be better to combine the implementation
statements when the med->media_event_code value is equal to 2 or 3.

Moreover, when a variable is equal to multiple values, it is better
to use a switch judgment statement.

Signed-off-by: tangmeng <tangmeng@uniontech.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/sr.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sr.c b/drivers/scsi/sr.c
index f925b1f1f9ad..610baa630067 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sr.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sr.c
@@ -222,12 +222,16 @@ static unsigned int sr_get_events(struct scsi_device *sdev)
 	if (eh->nea || eh->notification_class != 0x4)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (med->media_event_code == 1)
+	switch (med->media_event_code) {
+	case 1:
 		return DISK_EVENT_EJECT_REQUEST;
-	else if (med->media_event_code == 2)
-		return DISK_EVENT_MEDIA_CHANGE;
-	else if (med->media_event_code == 3)
+	case 2:
+	case 3:
 		return DISK_EVENT_MEDIA_CHANGE;
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1