Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:af89:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id iu9csp322739pxb; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 23:10:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypfCtuihtpeaUOdMpnxb/a5DMAZEU01z2mDKkhCCAx3dKcfFifvpBQnbfmf/UuzSNwNs35 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:42c6:: with SMTP id i6mr7162860edc.166.1643353846825; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 23:10:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1643353846; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EdPgNhqsDP6NKJE1Srxdnjh7z9i9TJ0kBrQEJq+vJDCDJAnbKpWFrbPuoNvqqX2V2C MRH9ZoLCSd3zYi4Zp9Nj+sKXVFHBupgl13aBfwtI90lJHplXzOpbfrKAoKYmvYL+brQg YZu0KP371DnXDUsw1QeReTf2NEimbi9hKrXHLfzn0ndM2vfdwz/ghpVMCxNotmL36FuE TGTaflq9Ss1tR35jMloS0gPhdNM9YFnYADNwo4tJurFgZmbcXkEwX8UzMWPra90XQM8s xQUT4mTzBBpklhIKQBpLrehiQ67ly5bg1Oqafn3+4JvYtpMJ+av2snJub0KGv1s9rxnv IPew== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=HwR9fk2QQK/YxjTprprpHKTWvRd8MGlatQQX+xIjztg=; b=km6c+PO1zkH3poOdP4yUI197s+ZWdDXEfVczxNEHkZZcMe8AHPIV9Wgp6fHgDOQksU FCuxawVucHphONGTiT71hQ368SqCwGgpDXALo8lQiGFGvC1HNCCh/08qCqlVGvbw1Ync vL7IY9byl7TPcTGFEfS1u9cBguBwTtPKWVAPrRkQkUKV6f00+1/Te+DlQrlxOc65BczP d0D4N2jXUbVT9AkG9WoyFOvpnKTn138dHb1go25QH71Vg1UYUMCh76fCw8DpSd+wGwQa bAFnuvSGs8zZbljgEQHS0NGlkJQWe4t4b16UQbymSYZDkKatWgISw1Tph/Ak/heW69Cu 8U9Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h5si2441828ejo.112.2022.01.27.23.10.22; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 23:10:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242692AbiA0O4a (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:56:30 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:37568 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238299AbiA0O4a (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:56:30 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29CC113E; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 06:56:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [10.57.14.34]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D73833F766; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 06:56:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:56:10 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Sven Schnelle , Yinan Liu , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Sachin Sant , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, hca@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [powerpc] ftrace warning kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2068 with code-patching selftests Message-ID: References: <0fa0daec-881a-314b-e28b-3828e80bbd90@linux.alibaba.com> <20220127074601.41a3773d@rorschach.local.home> <20220127085543.200dd38e@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220127085543.200dd38e@gandalf.local.home> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 08:55:43AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:33:02 +0000 > Mark Rutland wrote: > > > I want to get the regression fixed ASAP, so can we take a simple patch for -rc2 > > which disables the build-time sort where it's currently broken (by limiting the > > opt-in to arm and x86), then follow-up per-architecture to re-enable it if > > desired/safe? > > I'm going to retest my patch that makes it an opt in for just x86 and arm > (32bit). I'll be pushing that hopefully later today. I have some other > patches to test as well. Great; thanks! Let me know if you'd like me to give that a spin on arm or arm64. Thanks, Mark.