Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 02:47:08 +0800
From:   Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
        bristot@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        pjt@google.com, posk@google.com, avagin@google.com,
        jannh@google.com, tdelisle@uwaterloo.ca, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        posk@posk.io, Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 5/5] sched: User Mode Concurency Groups
Message-ID: <YfLorAvvQJO5uhL5@geo.homenetwork>
References: <20220120155517.066795336@infradead.org>
 <20220120160822.914418096@infradead.org>
 <Ye67uQa4CwUuQJVY@geo.homenetwork>
 <YfKPQJ+Nr4Qokgim@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YfKPQJ+Nr4Qokgim@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 01:25:36PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:46:17PM +0800, Tao Zhou wrote:
> 
> > > +/* Called from syscall exit path and exceptions that can schedule */
> > > +void umcg_sys_exit(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
> > > +	long syscall = syscall_get_nr(tsk, regs);
> > > +
> > > +	if (syscall == __NR_umcg_wait ||
> > > +	    syscall == __NR_umcg_ctl)
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	if (tsk->umcg_server) {
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * Didn't block, we done.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		umcg_unpin_pages();
> > > +		return;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	umcg_unblock_and_wait();
> > 
> > umcg_unblock_and_wait() -> umcg_enqueue_and_wake() ->
> > umcg_wake_server() -> umcg_wake_task(tsk->umcg_server, ...)
> > 
> > tsk->umcg_server is NULL here and umcg_wake_task() use it to update
> > state in umcg_update_state(NULL, ...), that means tsk->umcg_clock
> > will happen something i do not know.
> 
> I think umcg_unblock_and_wait() will repin, at which point we should
> have tsk->umcg_server again.

That's right, I miss that.

> > There are two places to call umcg_unblock_and_wait(). One is in 
> > umcg_register() where the server is set. Another one is in
> > umcg_sys_exit() where the server is not set. May use a bool to
> > indicate if the server is set.
> 
> I'm not sure what you're on about, but I absolutely hate redundant
> state, that only leads to problems.


But, it's my noise though.