Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:af89:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id iu9csp759055pxb; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:20:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxC9k+JGdSCIjgttXt9efSdofzdLMfKfr8sSPHBLrf17+aMVM2ivJwRieiurPaZQZ8TyVsh X-Received: by 2002:a63:c17:: with SMTP id b23mr7316698pgl.45.1643390430072; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:20:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1643390430; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NOXnPDAc3OIvAKoL8PeKFKWJk9LlF1gwvsB/CjunZICq7zXgnGUMqJEYA1YFcZOKcF 7e5yXrI6fKPq7aYe+pNCgb5WWJZ/xZSCfbnstIo9Zh8U3jdyKLsqxodRS+Pyc74G2ltU icb3jjj9nXjHhBIwDB9fr0ND8wIvV62tmUKDQ0fL1DzbO1Aiul4rd2jAmCL6Xx6TUjOq YN2fstweioy5nrZWzWDmRBtij5c9Pnudc9R3GVUiyB8AQ31gUL/+draG8HEfEFD01v2r PyDSc4NGnLoCdEItuE9dSEkRaX4FG+HGMDMc+tI/2oIGLYCf1FYth3WXGiWRYNo75egi QeNQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=bXQc2X8HhAHLjcyzTOAbXsFtrNZgTzCYkQ7kz9pzFnM=; b=wM6J3fU19mngcl13UARJjQBpSaMXboAUh27f/pjonglt2byOi9hJsSRGZ9r+6MpwyS YQRgH20YPK496LUSffiC5HqFzA4wRncy+Ke94hYzUxniXIXqP8xnUoYCgEvos8JS39fd +C041aIomZENZukfnFQSri7pGc1T2rRBTtMMb/A2RH51utJLbKIlPvkt1ke1RgFybdNS P4kd2JRyGRzUtcyd+PrdmHPoZ1gzn1uuLJuSAQsfHtvmnN8IMsXb0W5lpuq3gnfEZ5YM GIjsQjg247spuZACPtx1Z/RxaLn9zdDuI+YRaPdiQwfztiDtVvkdypxO2Vt59cnsIHgF 6KxQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=nJuhMm9I; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 184si5610448pff.344.2022.01.28.09.20.15; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:20:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=nJuhMm9I; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343979AbiA0UVV (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:21:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48008 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231500AbiA0UVV (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:21:21 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8263FC061714 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:21:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id ka4so8382162ejc.11 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:21:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bXQc2X8HhAHLjcyzTOAbXsFtrNZgTzCYkQ7kz9pzFnM=; b=nJuhMm9IHAEble9TAoDROlQ/QWNyfo/vDG/6tJpKMMxDZ5FJFwjrULTosBR72YZul2 xJdVoevILTjfqhUKwI9a//OrU4BihcW/CoPGAzaZsgQCr+e/j0UN6j2YxcEscIJGensm XV2QxZhKXRWgexjkF5O+Fd/+GkU+8syoO2o+ALTtfVp/SvJyXN6UJHI2HN6jCmS5xPCZ IMdrpfNUmzWYbC0HpQ0r7F/y0whbKHZWVOiiBQ4UKbrcWLszcPINyNXpxLdYOF+qBw4s IYPOed18lRNRynPupcm2AJAuZGAJFxH2LDKJ9N2phFAcfApbtNyezD4KiuXxUMVkbXZv fufg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bXQc2X8HhAHLjcyzTOAbXsFtrNZgTzCYkQ7kz9pzFnM=; b=JetuzPOfP1DrPAbrhs0SGOCD3vCsFDpHZnjkq+lN2zDf18qeyFRnDtd7BV22NuCDH6 5uVDREoCi1EQ8BjKxQYZIbNAS6XNssXaEmYUpdjHHoZQ0/6MC9OQh4sO9OBDcTrd6Is5 KRjCrdA8wXluE4ZlEL0Tz76lBVTbqQCsK+pvlqyeO2kiX0bVOi7s/tJXhS+aE0jvSy6D ArfF8DUC2ca84STlDFj5ADfg+Ga56Lf9/++YPj2SWBOqovN6QqysK/hEZWHNGX2hxTeJ EWBt7hnFY8UZ8biQxnQcdrAl/yaEcauzctpCPGfrdrFSKwWEpgg7aO4iEEx1RNP9Xux5 fFrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532RqnyjkwF0J6bNOENwWDTFL0/ofewaoEAbJRyW0FndvxSW6PGy 1zMy1Cd2obgD+6MxXXEHx2t9CvB6IlyahSw/i/MlVg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3f0d:: with SMTP id hq13mr4276734ejc.358.1643314878634; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:21:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220125210011.3817742-1-dlatypov@google.com> <20220125210011.3817742-4-dlatypov@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Daniel Latypov Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:21:04 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] kunit: factor out str constants from binary assertion structs To: David Gow Cc: brendanhiggins@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 7:39 PM David Gow wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 5:00 AM Daniel Latypov wrote: > > > > If the compiler doesn't optimize them away, each kunit assertion (use of > > KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ, etc.) can use 88 bytes of stack space in the worst and > > most common case. This has led to compiler warnings and a suggestion > > from Linus to move data from the structs into static const's where > > possible [1]. > > > > This builds upon [2] which did so for the base struct kunit_assert type. > > That only reduced sizeof(struct kunit_binary_assert) from 88 to 64. > > > > Given these are by far the most commonly used asserts, this patch > > factors out the textual representations of the operands and comparator > > into another static const, saving 16 more bytes. > > > > In detail, KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2 + 2, 5) yields the following struct > > (struct kunit_binary_assert) { > > .assert = , > > .operation = "==", > > .left_text = "2 + 2", > > .left_value = 4, > > .right_text = "5", > > .right_value = 5, > > } > > After this change > > static const struct kunit_binary_assert_text __text = { > > .operation = "==", > > .left_text = "2 + 2", > > .right_text = "5", > > }; > > (struct kunit_binary_assert) { > > .assert = , > > .text = &__text, > > .left_value = 4, > > .right_value = 5, > > } > > > > This also DRYs the code a bit more since these str fields were repeated > > for the string and pointer versions of kunit_binary_assert. > > > > Note: we could name the kunit_binary_assert_text fields left/right > > instead of left_text/right_text. But that would require changing the > > macros a bit since they have args called "left" and "right" which would > > be substituted in `.left = #left` as `.2 + 2 = \"2 + 2\"`. > > > > [1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220113165931.451305-6-dlatypov@google.com/ > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov > > --- > > This definitely _feels_ like it's adding a bit more complexity than > would be ideal by splitting this out into a separate function, but I > do agree that it's worth it. I'll note that this was *more* of a simplification until I deduped the binary macros. Since we only have one macro now passing in the left/right/op strings now, it doesn't look like as much of an improvement anymore. So now the main other benefits are DRYing the assert structs. And I lean towards feeling that + stack size decrease = good enough reason to go ahead with the refactor. Re complexity, here's what KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1 + 1, 2) turns into do { typeof(1 + 1) __left = (1 + 1); typeof(2) __right = (2); static const struct kunit_binary_assert_text __text = { .operation = "==", .left_text = "1 + 1", .right_text = "2", }; do { if (__builtin_expect(!!(!(__left == __right)), 0)) { static const struct kunit_loc loc = { .file = "lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c", .line = 29 }; struct kunit_binary_assert __assertion = { .assert = { .format = kunit_binary_assert_format }, .text = &__text, .left_value = __left, .right_value = __right }; kunit_do_failed_assertion(test, &loc, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, &__assertion.assert, ((void *)0)); } } while (0); } while (0); Actually, looking at this, I realize we should probably 1) move the __text decl into the if statement 2) probably should rename loc to __loc, oops. I'll send out a v2 that does #1. Maybe I'll include another patch that does #2 at the end of this series since the source patch already got picked up into Shuah's tree. > > I think left_text / right_text are good enough names, too: I wouldn't > bother trying to make them .left/.right. > > > Reviewed-by: David Gow > > Cheers, > -- David > > > include/kunit/assert.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > > include/kunit/test.h | 20 +++++++++++------ > > lib/kunit/assert.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++---------------- > > 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/kunit/assert.h b/include/kunit/assert.h > > index 649bfac9f406..4b52e12c2ae8 100644 > > --- a/include/kunit/assert.h > > +++ b/include/kunit/assert.h > > @@ -150,14 +150,25 @@ void kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, > > .value = val \ > > } > > > > +/** > > + * struct kunit_binary_assert_text - holds strings for &struct > > + * kunit_binary_assert and friends to try and make the structs smaller. > > + * @operation: A string representation of the comparison operator (e.g. "=="). > > + * @left_text: A string representation of the left expression (e.g. "2+2"). > > + * @right_text: A string representation of the right expression (e.g. "2+2"). > > + */ > > +struct kunit_binary_assert_text { > > + const char *operation; > > + const char *left_text; > > + const char *right_text; > > +}; > > + > > /** > > * struct kunit_binary_assert - An expectation/assertion that compares two > > * non-pointer values (for example, KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1 + 1, 2)). > > * @assert: The parent of this type. > > - * @operation: A string representation of the comparison operator (e.g. "=="). > > - * @left_text: A string representation of the expression in the left slot. > > + * @text: Holds the textual representations of the operands and op (e.g. "=="). > > * @left_value: The actual evaluated value of the expression in the left slot. > > - * @right_text: A string representation of the expression in the right slot. > > * @right_value: The actual evaluated value of the expression in the right slot. > > * > > * Represents an expectation/assertion that compares two non-pointer values. For > > @@ -166,10 +177,8 @@ void kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, > > */ > > struct kunit_binary_assert { > > struct kunit_assert assert; > > - const char *operation; > > - const char *left_text; > > + const struct kunit_binary_assert_text *text; > > long long left_value; > > - const char *right_text; > > long long right_value; > > }; > > > > @@ -182,10 +191,8 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, > > * kunit_binary_assert, kunit_binary_ptr_assert, etc. > > * > > * @format_func: a function which formats the assert to a string. > > - * @op_str: A string representation of the comparison operator (e.g. "=="). > > - * @left_str: A string representation of the expression in the left slot. > > + * @text_: Pointer to a kunit_binary_assert_text. > > * @left_val: The actual evaluated value of the expression in the left slot. > > - * @right_str: A string representation of the expression in the right slot. > > * @right_val: The actual evaluated value of the expression in the right slot. > > * > > * Initializes a binary assert like kunit_binary_assert, > > @@ -194,16 +201,12 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, > > * This is ultimately used by binary assertion macros like KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ, etc. > > */ > > #define KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(format_func, \ > > - op_str, \ > > - left_str, \ > > + text_, \ > > left_val, \ > > - right_str, \ > > right_val) { \ > > .assert = { .format = format_func }, \ > > - .operation = op_str, \ > > - .left_text = left_str, \ > > + .text = text_, \ > > .left_value = left_val, \ > > - .right_text = right_str, \ > > .right_value = right_val \ > > } > > > > @@ -211,10 +214,8 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, > > * struct kunit_binary_ptr_assert - An expectation/assertion that compares two > > * pointer values (for example, KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, foo, bar)). > > * @assert: The parent of this type. > > - * @operation: A string representation of the comparison operator (e.g. "=="). > > - * @left_text: A string representation of the expression in the left slot. > > + * @text: Holds the textual representations of the operands and op (e.g. "=="). > > * @left_value: The actual evaluated value of the expression in the left slot. > > - * @right_text: A string representation of the expression in the right slot. > > * @right_value: The actual evaluated value of the expression in the right slot. > > * > > * Represents an expectation/assertion that compares two pointer values. For > > @@ -223,10 +224,8 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, > > */ > > struct kunit_binary_ptr_assert { > > struct kunit_assert assert; > > - const char *operation; > > - const char *left_text; > > + const struct kunit_binary_assert_text *text; > > const void *left_value; > > - const char *right_text; > > const void *right_value; > > }; > > > > @@ -238,10 +237,8 @@ void kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, > > * struct kunit_binary_str_assert - An expectation/assertion that compares two > > * string values (for example, KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, foo, "bar")). > > * @assert: The parent of this type. > > - * @operation: A string representation of the comparison operator (e.g. "=="). > > - * @left_text: A string representation of the expression in the left slot. > > + * @text: Holds the textual representations of the operands and comparator. > > * @left_value: The actual evaluated value of the expression in the left slot. > > - * @right_text: A string representation of the expression in the right slot. > > * @right_value: The actual evaluated value of the expression in the right slot. > > * > > * Represents an expectation/assertion that compares two string values. For > > @@ -250,10 +247,8 @@ void kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, > > */ > > struct kunit_binary_str_assert { > > struct kunit_assert assert; > > - const char *operation; > > - const char *left_text; > > + const struct kunit_binary_assert_text *text; > > const char *left_value; > > - const char *right_text; > > const char *right_value; > > }; > > > > diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h > > index a93dfb8ff393..088ff394ae94 100644 > > --- a/include/kunit/test.h > > +++ b/include/kunit/test.h > > @@ -874,16 +874,19 @@ void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test, > > do { \ > > typeof(left) __left = (left); \ > > typeof(right) __right = (right); \ > > + static const struct kunit_binary_assert_text __text = { \ > > + .operation = #op, \ > > + .left_text = #left, \ > > + .right_text = #right, \ > > + }; \ > > \ > > KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, \ > > assert_type, \ > > __left op __right, \ > > assert_class, \ > > KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(format_func, \ > > - #op, \ > > - #left, \ > > + &__text, \ > > __left, \ > > - #right, \ > > __right), \ > > fmt, \ > > ##__VA_ARGS__); \ > > @@ -928,17 +931,20 @@ do { \ > > ...) \ > > do { \ > > const char *__left = (left); \ > > - const char *__right = (right); \ > > + const char *__right = (right); \ > > + static const struct kunit_binary_assert_text __text = { \ > > + .operation = #op, \ > > + .left_text = #left, \ > > + .right_text = #right, \ > > + }; \ > > \ > > KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, \ > > assert_type, \ > > strcmp(__left, __right) op 0, \ > > kunit_binary_str_assert, \ > > KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(kunit_binary_str_assert_format,\ > > - #op, \ > > - #left, \ > > + &__text, \ > > __left, \ > > - #right, \ > > __right), \ > > fmt, \ > > ##__VA_ARGS__); \ > > diff --git a/lib/kunit/assert.c b/lib/kunit/assert.c > > index c9c7ee0dfafa..d00d6d181ee8 100644 > > --- a/lib/kunit/assert.c > > +++ b/lib/kunit/assert.c > > @@ -122,18 +122,18 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, > > > > string_stream_add(stream, > > KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s %s %s, but\n", > > - binary_assert->left_text, > > - binary_assert->operation, > > - binary_assert->right_text); > > - if (!is_literal(stream->test, binary_assert->left_text, > > + binary_assert->text->left_text, > > + binary_assert->text->operation, > > + binary_assert->text->right_text); > > + if (!is_literal(stream->test, binary_assert->text->left_text, > > binary_assert->left_value, stream->gfp)) > > string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld\n", > > - binary_assert->left_text, > > + binary_assert->text->left_text, > > binary_assert->left_value); > > - if (!is_literal(stream->test, binary_assert->right_text, > > + if (!is_literal(stream->test, binary_assert->text->right_text, > > binary_assert->right_value, stream->gfp)) > > string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld", > > - binary_assert->right_text, > > + binary_assert->text->right_text, > > binary_assert->right_value); > > kunit_assert_print_msg(message, stream); > > } > > @@ -150,14 +150,14 @@ void kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, > > > > string_stream_add(stream, > > KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s %s %s, but\n", > > - binary_assert->left_text, > > - binary_assert->operation, > > - binary_assert->right_text); > > + binary_assert->text->left_text, > > + binary_assert->text->operation, > > + binary_assert->text->right_text); > > string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %px\n", > > - binary_assert->left_text, > > + binary_assert->text->left_text, > > binary_assert->left_value); > > string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %px", > > - binary_assert->right_text, > > + binary_assert->text->right_text, > > binary_assert->right_value); > > kunit_assert_print_msg(message, stream); > > } > > @@ -190,16 +190,16 @@ void kunit_binary_str_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, > > > > string_stream_add(stream, > > KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s %s %s, but\n", > > - binary_assert->left_text, > > - binary_assert->operation, > > - binary_assert->right_text); > > - if (!is_str_literal(binary_assert->left_text, binary_assert->left_value)) > > + binary_assert->text->left_text, > > + binary_assert->text->operation, > > + binary_assert->text->right_text); > > + if (!is_str_literal(binary_assert->text->left_text, binary_assert->left_value)) > > string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == \"%s\"\n", > > - binary_assert->left_text, > > + binary_assert->text->left_text, > > binary_assert->left_value); > > - if (!is_str_literal(binary_assert->right_text, binary_assert->right_value)) > > + if (!is_str_literal(binary_assert->text->right_text, binary_assert->right_value)) > > string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == \"%s\"", > > - binary_assert->right_text, > > + binary_assert->text->right_text, > > binary_assert->right_value); > > kunit_assert_print_msg(message, stream); > > } > > -- > > 2.35.0.rc2.247.g8bbb082509-goog > >