Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:af89:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id iu9csp2412142pxb; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 15:41:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAP/I8A/tCotIt3ZNebomL6Z6ITTjeUHvncoXv6aFb2iOZQoSAkhsuO+HClo/dScOY1Zi+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:58c6:: with SMTP id e6mr14492142ejs.733.1643586102901; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 15:41:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1643586102; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=u5lLWCyUFve4QlFoEafRgrECvFHUnNlepUoeWdb2MAg9fuMjdttAMy9wGDoJSBT++K vdXe2GcA7EtEO8MVRgRfEoWIdH11u8sOH7cy/yt73oJkxgMYumiY7GlQdDwtY85hPPt3 V/vHOct4BWihm7yIJlO+UMRINIICOjcOTNBXbb5HcpAEFTjKlxzulKo6n2prnO7KW3JM q77ENSylAZ8Be8VTfgShozlSPGsLAgOBRrrsSORU4dHZkpO7hTeD/ccSjSd+lKrcfxaJ 5Szw1S6QZoG0nGCku5S64gVTKT3z6ErBh2CSUT6ViXTQD5+Owbw9494TpM79jl1cCepA 7kEA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:organization :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=P3RVmK1/PHIT/K/vRfwQmZuyVW8oc6qkrGNE4RBfJ2s=; b=ei5hr7jHGi7bZjEh5NSysO+tE4yz5NZWv+tMCgxV8Zzu2Gtji/D3i0hwY5qp/SA5L8 BDB77HbvsZDVSKOm3gZapW7yeIbguYIHdR81stK5Ab/pjaxB7JVg00q+mHMIEYm8ui4c uQfIMpSUTGxSTWAFtUlx4GlevE8qyuVmHFrAlPEdcTby6K4RASwPSpD/E5jhRr8DwSMm eMXuFQfs/l2arnV42a8p5Yb/WU/e15qm2TwIoL/s9bV/K1heYpFTtMYULEtHX1LWHpo6 1Rbes/DNuUB6IIe0n4asyC+XOF7TPtdMP/2bn/JZZTRglPRMnW+pofXjOLu9Ogc9+A6p 3IFg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@waldekranz-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=LYUosqZr; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dp20si7333300ejc.526.2022.01.30.15.41.18; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 15:41:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@waldekranz-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=LYUosqZr; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345346AbiA1Kt4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 28 Jan 2022 05:49:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47670 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229462AbiA1Kty (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2022 05:49:54 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27D4FC061714 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 02:49:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id u6so10897999lfm.10 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 02:49:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=waldekranz-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:organization:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P3RVmK1/PHIT/K/vRfwQmZuyVW8oc6qkrGNE4RBfJ2s=; b=LYUosqZrCVV8Wc3nPps9qFzsrFbdjYOAITcmqa1/iVhhfdPpFNWOdaqFPZPt9ZnGOh 7bLHUbwqEfJ4cdgqrjm0yACCpI2dkABzx335mERYjpJrvJ58h2HmqQz0b3t+FzUO0c6d WSgAKbGoNg5ykXkcG9q8BQQFxRBGxcxhSwUocDKtMyDqKO5IwcnAAN1UwlWEhugMppvs ZCmaTwquqawqmhdeid9ce+MfR2IKH1RGTFUr4VhKpjxL/Pmj3A75WrcIjDO1vdpHqWMS QzRcQQFzTBJ+mcghyCxLJlhg1tHX/2eyd5rabm425EsHG13OeppwAiEobBvAknOSpGyo 3vLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:organization:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P3RVmK1/PHIT/K/vRfwQmZuyVW8oc6qkrGNE4RBfJ2s=; b=RKY0QIy0paogeYA818RNbkD4mvP7xNLnCThdBjTp7zNoYo+wlftFDgbF9CXD9Oe++M FM36Lhjyf1jQBlEUQa4otiTI+wNZgr5SsbNixmZ9lPLfd4NxMlmkZDe6EP0gwQyfNiIp MeHCV3RA8CM4a//EGB8CSRBcbZG4pk56wv4SufOH0RKBvTJfwPKYf5CPyEt2CRhQum6g M44PrfeSpr6E2GEkT/B5839daVxZIkgoA4W4vc1QryHThrwrIhdaQWAHrPum4dY7IBks B3ADBOuNm1t8VUDpG+2ZcGK2NOoVysTPIQUzjwvSVqj7Ldi5jV+kL3N0vGqbYzwXDxzw sirw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zQO/5PZnqRh6UlnRjwl+3h47Nnxd8GK3T49Jzrpgg/P0rRotv f1IRZjeMaILXLsSOgp0FWRQMj734V+Huew== X-Received: by 2002:a19:8c19:: with SMTP id o25mr5632962lfd.300.1643366992489; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 02:49:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from veiron.westermo.com (static-193-12-47-89.cust.tele2.se. [193.12.47.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v29sm1931347ljv.72.2022.01.28.02.49.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Jan 2022 02:49:52 -0800 (PST) From: Tobias Waldekranz To: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , Vladimir Oltean , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Improve performance of busy bit polling Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:49:37 +0100 Message-Id: <20220128104938.2211441-2-tobias@waldekranz.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220128104938.2211441-1-tobias@waldekranz.com> References: <20220128104938.2211441-1-tobias@waldekranz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: Westermo Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Avoid a long delay when a busy bit is still set and has to be polled again. Measurements on a system with 2 Opals (6097F) and one Agate (6352) show that even with this much tighter loop, we have about a 50% chance of the bit being cleared on the first poll, all other accesses see the bit being cleared on the second poll. On a standard MDIO bus running MDC at 2.5MHz, a single access with 32 bits of preamble plus 32 bits of data takes 64*(1/2.5MHz) = 25.6us. This means that mv88e6xxx_smi_direct_wait took 26us + CPU overhead in the fast scenario, but 26us + 1500us + 26us + CPU overhead in the slow case - bringing the average close to 1ms. With this change in place, the slow case is closer to 2*26us + CPU overhead, with the average well below 100us - a 10x improvement. This translates to real-world winnings. On a 3-chip 20-port system, the modprobe time drops by 88%: Before: root@coronet:~# time modprobe mv88e6xxx real 0m 15.99s user 0m 0.00s sys 0m 1.52s After: root@coronet:~# time modprobe mv88e6xxx real 0m 2.21s user 0m 0.00s sys 0m 1.54s Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz --- drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 10 +++++++--- drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/smi.c | 8 ++++++-- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c index 58ca684d73f7..de8a568a8c53 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c @@ -86,12 +86,16 @@ int mv88e6xxx_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int addr, int reg, u16 val) int mv88e6xxx_wait_mask(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int addr, int reg, u16 mask, u16 val) { + const unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(50); u16 data; int err; int i; - /* There's no bus specific operation to wait for a mask */ - for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) { + /* There's no bus specific operation to wait for a mask. Even + * if the initial poll takes longer than 50ms, always do at + * least one more attempt. + */ + for (i = 0; time_before(jiffies, timeout) || (i < 2); i++) { err = mv88e6xxx_read(chip, addr, reg, &data); if (err) return err; @@ -99,7 +103,7 @@ int mv88e6xxx_wait_mask(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int addr, int reg, if ((data & mask) == val) return 0; - usleep_range(1000, 2000); + cpu_relax(); } dev_err(chip->dev, "Timeout while waiting for switch\n"); diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/smi.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/smi.c index 282fe08db050..466d2aaa9fcb 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/smi.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/smi.c @@ -55,11 +55,15 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_smi_direct_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, static int mv88e6xxx_smi_direct_wait(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int dev, int reg, int bit, int val) { + const unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(50); u16 data; int err; int i; - for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) { + /* Even if the initial poll takes longer than 50ms, always do + * at least one more attempt. + */ + for (i = 0; time_before(jiffies, timeout) || (i < 2); i++) { err = mv88e6xxx_smi_direct_read(chip, dev, reg, &data); if (err) return err; @@ -67,7 +71,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_smi_direct_wait(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, if (!!(data & BIT(bit)) == !!val) return 0; - usleep_range(1000, 2000); + cpu_relax(); } return -ETIMEDOUT; -- 2.25.1