Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid: cleanup formatting of megaraid
To:     Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Cc:     kashyap.desai@broadcom.com, sumit.saxena@broadcom.com,
        shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@oracle.com, nathan@kernel.org,
        megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
References: <20220127151945.1244439-1-trix@redhat.com>
 <953eb015-4b78-f7b-5dc1-6491c6bf27e@linux-m68k.org>
 <CAKwvOdnWHVV+3s8SO=Q8FfZ7hVekRVDL5q+7CwAk_z44xaex8w@mail.gmail.com>
 <fb308f51-f16b-3d9b-80c2-180940236b00@redhat.com>
 <5554a75f65fddab4de60d61fd503fe73773dafbb.camel@perches.com>
 <c801989d-5f3e-84d2-24a0-7022be70da98@redhat.com>
 <7bff2de309384b7c9ee71ad90881d1e0bbe0a781.camel@perches.com>
From:   Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <0567fce4-256a-e1b1-dc66-221ba97153d5@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 07:30:31 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7bff2de309384b7c9ee71ad90881d1e0bbe0a781.camel@perches.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk


On 1/28/22 12:41 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 21:31 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>> On 1/27/22 6:43 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 16:32 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>>>> On 1/27/22 2:47 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>>>> + Miguel (the clang-format maintainer), Joe (checkpatch maintainer)
>>>>> These criticisms are worth reviewing.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 2:38 PM Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, trix@redhat.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> checkpatch reports several hundred formatting errors. Run these files
>>>>>>> through clang-format and knock off some of them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> That method seems like a good recipe for endless churn unless checkpatch
>>>>>> and clang-format really agree about these style rules.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why use checkpatch to assess code style, if we could simply diff the
>>>>>> existing source with the output from clang-format... but it seems that
>>>>>> clang-format harms readability, makes indentation errors and uses
>>>>>> inconsistent style rules. Some examples:
>>>> Problems with clang-format should be fixed, I'll take a look.
>>>>
>>>> I was reviewing this file for another isseue and could not get past how
>>>> horredously bad it was and really did not want to manually fix the 400+
>>>> formatting errors.  I will drop this patch and use the use these files
>>>> to verify the .clang-format .
>>> I think this is more an issue with clang-format than with checkpatch.
>>>
>>> If you have specific issues with what checkpatch reports for this
>>> file (or any other file), let me know.
>> Yes, I agree. Its a clang-format problem.
>>
>> I will be looking to minimize the .clang-format settings to only those
>> that agree with checkpatch.
>>
>> Then add settings back in later if their problems can be worked out.
> Another option would be to use:
>
> 	./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --fix[-inplace] [--types=<list>] <files>
>
> where types is an optional list of specific things to change
>
> see:
> 	./scripts/checkpatch.pl --list-types --verbose
>
> to show the possible types.
>
> Only some of these types can be changed with --fix or --fix-inplace
>
> If using checkpatch to change formatting, it sometimes can be useful
> to run checkpatch --fix multiple times on the same file as a
> checkpatch --fix can create a change than checkpatch will suggest
> should itself be fixed.
>
> Of course another option is to do nothing as many will complain,
> sometimes senselessly, about 'churn'.

A testsuite for the fixers may help with churn

Any interest or thought on organization ?

I can take stab at one.

Tom

>
>
>