Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:af89:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id iu9csp2747939pxb; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 03:31:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8+iCiHgNM5Eswr78R6MBYPQpo2/BdMt71LYKG6Ruan4hTHe8MirEo7MQ4GLvOt6xEN01V X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1bcf:: with SMTP id oa15mr33467739pjb.67.1643628697493; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 03:31:37 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1643628697; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SFTKYzUHASjv1KSMfLpDF3d4J5HtK7tCCMkhzPzL5x234Oyq3n7OHb57xhEiRH+yh6 w7DZphftQ9m8T2etahJGIy2wHhiHVKxXd+CtdHfEku0+Qzu1ZIJ8XqkIndseDI7bvH41 O7/OQwKRILlUkz7AmKVjll6IcMliPIBshLVL2r1midNXHmkagnGcRvV4SP7V8x07ly+0 KKCTzygdNJ0kpFzUjn80rba9pzm6GmvQYpvhn1fNsUzjjOQwjGB1JxWCNCkgf4Umhle4 fNddEnm+8B/JOaIxRhXVSeHSw7t4dgh5Ytsh4sCa0RpTPgZcitGE04aiBvq24is4krK1 H1EQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=qBrhGKhqGDo3ZZGcfTOvBOKxFA+ZreyYbNcf2efMXZM=; b=xN6uj/iim159lR50LlnZvlSqqdApWQDIrxNFEfLH7lrs0AReGRNDq7r+g/khg1g+NP UmOnkal/WZ7/aD+Riciu8WlIxrjEtx8s48hQB/GMHzr8UgiWdqds8HBsK7I7ojkYk5Ma uP+z1AFmwN9ViVzzY4uG7wcUvxjjWfc+u+nr+ESF3RERu5axhoT5FP4qIqiigG5xXd5z p3mMvSb6M1rt4AFZojWWV5K3MN3nCSla+gD8zMj2I6vREa9dFLuDnDZredpLxRWmDesJ 6D9OSEiAhJ0G6gVucLC651GPi6GAHaBDsed8gSoN4Dzmtm89JKHetHT7RTf4cHFdowYZ Klgg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=eCZT8ZHO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w18si14721963pfu.290.2022.01.31.03.31.26; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 03:31:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=eCZT8ZHO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350800AbiA1TKY (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:10:24 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51858 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233548AbiA1TKW (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:10:22 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AC2DC061714 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:10:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id k17so7048665plk.0 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:10:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=qBrhGKhqGDo3ZZGcfTOvBOKxFA+ZreyYbNcf2efMXZM=; b=eCZT8ZHOAxpHWEDrUQItUG+sx9VZ3ivRTx1df1Hb5Ao4XU7bhUL0XL2KBld709fVmg IDG1SPPN7PGddHggtZ7UvMZKXPII86162snNhV14EycqAolc90+QaWRv3QLntN6Dm1Pl nUkCG8lpzib1yRSSeLP62nAkHwE+KizSFaUN8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=qBrhGKhqGDo3ZZGcfTOvBOKxFA+ZreyYbNcf2efMXZM=; b=bw0ik1HZoWmWsX8aj6yzS/f/rBnCttCF+cPVLSGLCxPPv9nBliKbbMLnNOKgPS3Y0S JHLde8b43OJxm6lnQBel2UaXZ9j+3BiHKlY0fQASyRMuzcWwNj7um+H/ZsZYm1KIKnpS ygUzvMh0IS9WCGojB2v0L3EnR/dD7UMwqkMqNYeC/dNOOfLS5fRnXJIBSV6AIGcYe5pV ktJgr3eZr7rGovNKg/BRm6AM0ACAD/4DP2KBXy/dWHDIUNDgThV3G6iUaGGT2uy908SI Rfs5B1cJkH4ieDgZuxNHPxB2rcSyhp5rvWIVos4QktRxBWIqWgDKsRK3agVvi2Yv3Tji p9Wg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Wk8wmXaT5GmZX1zZ1vNJjfwaZN5a1OXCJYd0X5ZIp43SKgBO6 VENlj9jlSoMgTvR78HS/SnNfwGbNHAW/2A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5890:: with SMTP id j16mr11399493pji.185.1643397021641; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:10:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2sm3142742pju.2.2022.01.28.11.10.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:10:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:10:20 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: Marco Elver Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Elena Reshetova , Alexander Potapenko , llvm@lists.linux.dev, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] stack: Constrain stack offset randomization with Clang builds Message-ID: <202201281058.83EC9565@keescook> References: <20220128114446.740575-1-elver@google.com> <20220128114446.740575-2-elver@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220128114446.740575-2-elver@google.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:44:46PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote: > All supported versions of Clang perform auto-init of __builtin_alloca() > when stack auto-init is on (CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_{ZERO,PATTERN}). > > add_random_kstack_offset() uses __builtin_alloca() to add a stack > offset. This means, when CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_{ZERO,PATTERN} is > enabled, add_random_kstack_offset() will auto-init that unused portion > of the stack used to add an offset. > > There are several problems with this: > > 1. These offsets can be as large as 1023 bytes. Performing > memset() on them isn't exactly cheap, and this is done on > every syscall entry. > > 2. Architectures adding add_random_kstack_offset() to syscall > entry implemented in C require them to be 'noinstr' (e.g. see > x86 and s390). The potential problem here is that a call to > memset may occur, which is not noinstr. > > A x86_64 defconfig kernel with Clang 11 and CONFIG_VMLINUX_VALIDATION shows: > > | vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: do_syscall_64()+0x9d: call to memset() leaves .noinstr.text section > | vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: do_int80_syscall_32()+0xab: call to memset() leaves .noinstr.text section > | vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __do_fast_syscall_32()+0xe2: call to memset() leaves .noinstr.text section > | vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: fixup_bad_iret()+0x2f: call to memset() leaves .noinstr.text section > > Clang 14 (unreleased) will introduce a way to skip alloca initialization > via __builtin_alloca_uninitialized() (https://reviews.llvm.org/D115440). > > Constrain RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET to only be enabled if no stack > auto-init is enabled, the compiler is GCC, or Clang is version 14+. Use > __builtin_alloca_uninitialized() if the compiler provides it, as is done > by Clang 14. > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YbHTKUjEejZCLyhX@elver.google.com > Fixes: 39218ff4c625 ("stack: Optionally randomize kernel stack offset each syscall") > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver > --- > arch/Kconfig | 1 + > include/linux/randomize_kstack.h | 14 ++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig > index 2cde48d9b77c..c5b50bfe31c1 100644 > --- a/arch/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/Kconfig > @@ -1163,6 +1163,7 @@ config RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET > bool "Support for randomizing kernel stack offset on syscall entry" if EXPERT > default y > depends on HAVE_ARCH_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET > + depends on INIT_STACK_NONE || !CC_IS_CLANG || CLANG_VERSION >= 140000 This makes it _unavailable_ for folks with Clang < 14, which seems too strong, especially since it's run-time off by default. I'd prefer dropping this hunk and adding some language to the _DEFAULT help noting the specific performance impact on Clang < 14. > help > The kernel stack offset can be randomized (after pt_regs) by > roughly 5 bits of entropy, frustrating memory corruption > diff --git a/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h b/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h > index 91f1b990a3c3..5c711d73ed10 100644 > --- a/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h > +++ b/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h > @@ -17,8 +17,18 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(u32, kstack_offset); > * alignment. Also, since this use is being explicitly masked to a max of > * 10 bits, stack-clash style attacks are unlikely. For more details see > * "VLAs" in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst > + * > + * The normal alloca() can be initialized with INIT_STACK_ALL. Initializing the > + * unused area on each syscall entry is expensive, and generating an implicit > + * call to memset() may also be problematic (such as in noinstr functions). > + * Therefore, if the compiler provides it, use the "uninitialized" variant. Can you include the note that GCC doesn't initialize its alloca()? Otherwise, yeah, looks good to me. -Kees > */ > -void *__builtin_alloca(size_t size); > +#if __has_builtin(__builtin_alloca_uninitialized) > +#define __kstack_alloca __builtin_alloca_uninitialized > +#else > +#define __kstack_alloca __builtin_alloca > +#endif > + > /* > * Use, at most, 10 bits of entropy. We explicitly cap this to keep the > * "VLA" from being unbounded (see above). 10 bits leaves enough room for > @@ -37,7 +47,7 @@ void *__builtin_alloca(size_t size); > if (static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET_DEFAULT, \ > &randomize_kstack_offset)) { \ > u32 offset = raw_cpu_read(kstack_offset); \ > - u8 *ptr = __builtin_alloca(KSTACK_OFFSET_MAX(offset)); \ > + u8 *ptr = __kstack_alloca(KSTACK_OFFSET_MAX(offset)); \ > /* Keep allocation even after "ptr" loses scope. */ \ > asm volatile("" :: "r"(ptr) : "memory"); \ > } \ > -- > 2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog > -- Kees Cook