Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <9c4a8275-236d-67b6-07f9-5e46f66396c0@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:54:26 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.2
Content-Language: en-US
To:     ira.weiny@intel.com, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220127175505.851391-1-ira.weiny@intel.com>
 <20220127175505.851391-7-ira.weiny@intel.com>
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 06/44] mm/pkeys: Add Kconfig options for PKS
In-Reply-To: <20220127175505.851391-7-ira.weiny@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 1/27/22 09:54, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> 
> Protection Key Supervisor, PKS, is a feature used by kernel code only.
> As such if no kernel users are configured the PKS code is unnecessary
> overhead.
> 
> Define a Kconfig structure which allows kernel code to detect PKS
> support by an architecture and then subsequently enable that support
> within the architecture.
> 
> ARCH_HAS_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS indicates to kernel consumers that an
> architecture supports pkeys.  PKS users can then select
> ARCH_ENABLE_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS to turn on the support within the
> architecture.
> 
> If ARCH_ENABLE_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS is not selected architectures avoid the
> PKS overhead.
> 
> ARCH_ENABLE_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS remains off until the first kernel use case
> sets it.

This is heavy on the "what" and weak on the "why".

Why isn't this an x86-specific Kconfig?  Why do we need two Kconfigs?
Good old user pkeys only has one:

	config ARCH_HAS_PKEYS
	        bool

and it's in arch-generic code because there are ppc and x86
implementations *and* the pkey support touches generic code.

This might become evident later in the series, but it's clear as mud as
it stands.