Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 29 Jan 2022 14:30:00 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To:     Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
Cc:     robh@kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-imx@nxp.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] arm64: dts: imx8mq: fix mipi_csi port numbering
Message-ID: <20220129062959.GU4686@dragon>
References: <20220121093326.2388251-1-martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220121093326.2388251-1-martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:33:24AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> hi Shawn and all interested,
> 
> This is a fix for an embarrassing bug that slipped into commit
> bcadd5f66c2a ("arm64: dts: imx8mq: add mipi csi phy and csi bridge descriptions")
> and commit fed7603597fa ("arm64: dts: imx8mq-librem5: describe the selfie cam").
> 
> When preparing the imx8mq.dtsi description I only tested with port@1
> being connected to the csi bridge, but what I sent said port@0.
> 
> I have this on my list for a while and want to sort this out now. I'm
> sorry for the inconvenience. Until now imx8mq-librem5 is the only user
> (maybe because of this :).
> 
> thank you,
> 
>                               martin
> 
> 
> Martin Kepplinger (2):
>   arm64: dts: imx8mq: fix mipi_csi bidirectional port numbers
>   arm64: dts: imx8mq-librem5: fix mipi_csi1 port number to sensor

Applied both, thanks!