Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1945966AbXBIBBJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:01:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1945972AbXBIBBI (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:01:08 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:47736 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945966AbXBIBBG (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:01:06 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 17:00:59 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Paul Mackerras Cc: Kyle McMartin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21 Message-Id: <20070208170059.837d171e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <17867.50828.463593.134082@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <20070208150710.1324f6b4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070208233449.GC18899@athena.road.mcmartin.ca> <20070208155300.9347e0cb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <17867.50828.463593.134082@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1569 Lines: 35 On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:55:40 +1100 Paul Mackerras wrote: > Andrew Morton writes: > > > Once a subsystem has a subsystem tree (git or quilt) I basically never > > merge anything which belongs to that tree. It's always > > > > originator->mm->subsystemtree->Linus > > > > If the subsystem tree maintainer wants to tell me "I can't be bothered > > setting up a git pull for that, please merge it for me" then that's fine. > > > > But unless I'm told that, or unless the maintainer is vacationing or totally > > asleep or unless the fix has some sufficiently high obviousness*importance product, > > I'll just keep buffering it up. > > What about the sort of thing that crosses all archs? For example, the > local_t changes? Particularly in the case where the change has to be > made in generic code and in all archs at the same time, it makes sense > to me for you to send the whole batch to Linus at the same time, > rather than individual arch maintainers all sending their bit at > varying times. > yup. It's better of course if the changes aren't both-way dependent and often we do it that way. But if they really are that bound together then I'll stage the patch in -mm, ensure that it doesn't conflict with any queued-up arch patches and will merge it after the arch trees have gone in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/