Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:21:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:21:12 -0500 Received: from as3-3-4.ml.g.bonet.se ([194.236.33.69]:57604 "EHLO tellus.mine.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:20:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 22:50:46 +0100 (CET) From: Tobias Ringstrom To: Jeff Garzik cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [CFT] dmfe.c network driver update for 2.4 In-Reply-To: <3A130C6A.CDAD8AA2@mandrakesoft.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Tobias Ringstrom wrote: > > > > I have updated the dmfe.c network driver for 2.4.0-test by adding proper > > locking (I hope), and also made transmission much efficient. > > > > I would appreciate any feedback from people using this driver, to confirm > > that I did not break it. > > > > It would also be great if someone could take a look at the lock handling, > > to confirm that is is correct and sufficient. > > Would you mind creating a separate patch that -just- correcting the SMP > safety? That makes it much easier to review and apply, and then we can > consider the other changes... Such a patch will appear shortly. I and Frank Davis are currently merging our patches for dmfe.c. [Actually, I just added reasonable locks while my main goal was to improve performance. I did not realize that there was such a strong need for SMP safety (since it has been broken in that regard for a long time, without anyone fixing it).] /Tobias - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/