Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946236AbXBIJGK (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 04:06:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946237AbXBIJGK (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 04:06:10 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:36766 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946236AbXBIJGI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 04:06:08 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 01:05:57 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: =?ISO-8859-1?B?U+liYXN0aWVuIER1Z3Xp?= Cc: "Bharata B Rao" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21 Message-Id: <20070209010557.6506d39a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070209092611.72c221d3@frecb000686.frec.bull.fr> References: <20070208150710.1324f6b4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <344eb09a0702082132w100e3b27saea61ee30a28b50a@mail.gmail.com> <20070209092611.72c221d3@frecb000686.frec.bull.fr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2250 Lines: 56 On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:26:11 +0100 S?bastien Dugu? wrote: > On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:02:28 +0530 "Bharata B Rao" wrote: > > > Andrew, > > > > On 2/9/07, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > fsaio-add-a-wait-queue-arg-to-the-wait_bit-action-routine.patch > > > fsaio-add-a-wait-queue-arg-to-the-wait_bit-action-routine-gfs2-fix.patch > > > fsaio-rename-__lock_page-to-lock_page_blocking.patch > > > fsaio-interfaces-to-initialize-and-to-test-a-wait-bit-key.patch > > > fsaio-add-a-default-io-wait-bit-field-in-task-struct.patch > > > fsaio-enable-wait-bit-based-filtered-wakeups-to-work-for-aio.patch > > > fsaio-enable-wait-bit-based-filtered-wakeups-to-work-for-aio-fix.patch > > > fsaio-enable-wait-bit-based-filtered-wakeups-to-work-for-aio-fix-sparse-fix.patch > > > fsaio-enable-asynchronous-wait-page-and-lock-page.patch > > > fsaio-filesystem-aio-read.patch > > > fsaio-aio-o_sync-filesystem-write.patch > > > > > > Will wait to see what happens with febrils. > > > > > > aio-is-unlikely.patch > > > > > > Will merge. > > > > > > rework-compat_sys_io_submit.patch > > > fix-aioh-includes.patch > > > fix-access_ok-checks.patch > > > make-good_sigevent-non-static.patch > > > make-good_sigevent-non-static-fix.patch > > > make-__sigqueue_free-and.patch > > > aio-completion-signal-notification.patch > > > aio-completion-signal-notification-fix.patch > > > aio-completion-signal-notification-fixes-and-cleanups.patch > > > aio-completion-signal-notification-small-cleanup.patch > > > add-listio-syscall-support.patch > > > > > > I guess these are dependent upon fsaio. > > > > No. AIO completion signal notification patches and listio patch work > > independently of fsaio patches. Just that for buffered AIO case, the > > fsaio patches will make the behaviour truly asynchronous. > > > > Regards, > > Bharata. > > I concur. > But is the proposed listio implementation still relevant if we go and add the async syscalls? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/