Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946295AbXBIKMq (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 05:12:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946299AbXBIKMp (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 05:12:45 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:41326 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946295AbXBIKMo convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 05:12:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 02:12:42 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Lenar =?ISO-8859-1?B?TPVobXVz?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21 Message-Id: <20070209021242.03ba88d8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <45CC44D5.6050602@vision.ee> References: <20070208150710.1324f6b4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <45CC44D5.6050602@vision.ee> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1602 Lines: 40 On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:54:29 +0200 Lenar L?hmus wrote: > Hello, > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > sched-add-above-background-load-function.patch > > mm-implement-swap-prefetching.patch > > mm-implement-swap-prefetching-vs-zvc-stuff.patch > > mm-implement-swap-prefetching-vs-zvc-stuff-2.patch > > mm-implement-swap-prefetching-use-ctl_unnumbered.patch > > swap_prefetch-vs-zoned-counters.patch > > add-include-linux-freezerh-and-move-definitions-from-prefetch.patch > > zvc-support-nr_slab_reclaimable--nr_slab_unreclaimable-swap_prefetch.patch > > reduce-max_nr_zones-swap_prefetch-remove-incorrect-use-of-zone_highmem.patch > > sched-cleanup-remove-task_t-convert-to-struct-task_struct-prefetch.patch > > numa-add-zone_to_nid-function-swap_prefetch.patch > > remove-uses-of-kmem_cache_t-from-mm-and-include-linux-slabh-prefetch.patch > > > > Hold. > Why hold? > > It's been shown this patchset really helps desktop users. Has it? I don't think I've ever observed any benefits from it and I don't think anyone has ever got down and worked out what its drawbacks might be, and seen if they can be demonstrated in practice. I also have vague memories of some serious-sounding review comments about the code from Nick. > Why keep it in -mm for so long? I'm waiting to be shown that its benefits exceed its costs. Sometimes that's hard. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/