Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946447AbXBIN0U (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:26:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946449AbXBIN0U (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:26:20 -0500 Received: from fallbackmx02.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.133.72]:45853 "EHLO fallbackmx02.syd.optusnet.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946447AbXBIN0T (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:26:19 -0500 From: Con Kolivas To: jos poortvliet Subject: Re: [ck] Re: Swap prefetch merge plans Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 00:22:45 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: ck@vds.kolivas.org, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200702091038.37143.kernel@kolivas.org> <200702092321.20615.kernel@kolivas.org> <200702091413.06949.jos@mijnkamer.nl> In-Reply-To: <200702091413.06949.jos@mijnkamer.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702100022.45464.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1646 Lines: 36 On Saturday 10 February 2007 00:13, jos poortvliet wrote: > Nobody has said anything about costs, indeed. Now afaik, swap prefetch is > designed to have no/as little as possible costs, so that makes sense. Does > it have to have some bugs, which have to be adressed, before it can enter? > I'm sure this can be arranged, right, Con? > > Sorry if I sound sarcastic. I'm no hacker myself, and sometimes these > discussions don't make sense to me. A bit like the Staircase thingy -> > > "hi, I've got this piece of code which does the same as that piece, but > better" > "Why didn't you improve the old code?" > "This is a better design -> half the code but doing a better job" > "Well, it's not tested as much, so it won't go in. Go away!" > > There where those comments from Torvalds some time ago in an interview, > about the kernel community becoming harder to get involved with. As an > outsider, it sure seems so. I read frustrations everywhere. What about the > kevent guy, his blog: http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/blog > > I stumbled upon it when reading LWN. Seems pretty sad... I don't get the > technical stuff, but the frustration almost blows up your monitor. Is there > something fundamentally wrong with the kernel-hackers-culture, or are these > incidents? I greatly appreciate the support. Truly I do. But I do not like the direction this argument is going. Please let it go. -- -ck - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/