Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1a4d:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id nk13csp1424251pxb; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 04:51:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznYhrf3qc2BK95Rk1YNKWst9YmTahRMsM+dWs0mnygysvpZP/WexY3UyPC8cJI/2jQ2J2C X-Received: by 2002:a63:ed58:: with SMTP id m24mr23906433pgk.33.1643806272147; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 04:51:12 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1643806272; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ry6dZvXeuFvwEDES0vyHHdgqPEi3liYZK/W50gDLeeXCgL1hNgGtj9EVzZdyL2ONFe BcagkW8Ble3oFOUKACODJ/FKA5MfX2AelksGvCRhG3jcZP2LU6T/mUJlGZWQs1zOewBi ioR/rCH+5HiYt7ufbiXxA2+tEFFvhw134M9z3M4kHNAscPSZ2Fvyex2PdPaO2CPM1JhF Ae9u+2i2H4GOs3yOSgPgPoadFoutzPkHQYZpHxLS4aGaIq4dxrcc0v8WgwEOyHFJcjRZ f7k3dMomm8cEFouvMwjM9LBZElf0kFSUoyOqF1KMs0H3p6nmSBggLB8tyAaIQMCIb+P/ BexQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Lne6ugt12lckPijhXV10GazxpsCSOqghGUO39xNghtI=; b=MutNXbjZHfoOseuLzyom1/UCDs4jQ3fN75rpnfiobo5VDp3EvAQ3u/XVB9LOJOa/EQ a8HCuO+dmp1fCT+4+YJj9jtk44IP8i8n7NuJm8YHsb2xhKgH5ASUIp6JSl1nKpbT0urI q3Qhq3wph6bo2W4IjvEfv4f5TYkSONuAgFABjSwvy2hMLxotXQzTEOiFOSGV0WR+mwbg CqwNBdqPtGEqB2fARdgHrgba3+ZkR7aMVmDTaznVgyHveZSwBomniiVA0YSEzklqYgSc A1gXdbnb7wDDY1n84PPkk1w8CaKZ0q7V03shF/nGnfMVeOPtwPwTNz+MsMInOQycstRZ iFlg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=CMMrxA7v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bo7si4650437pjb.54.2022.02.02.04.51.00; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 04:51:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=CMMrxA7v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242117AbiBAS7c (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Feb 2022 13:59:32 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:60494 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229565AbiBAS7b (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2022 13:59:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1643741971; x=1675277971; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Gktx86xlN/ZBVuVz8/vY09Ew+iIHrktJgCYkPO84vf4=; b=CMMrxA7vydm47D1YpKfUe1zUT5+P/5IPKLaV3RTNrs4nZEwAkom8zsiw uYpVqp1dyQr9u8kWcLy6NNlzvt4vyOW2ESiiz/5hDN7JME2rIbEJ4z7lB 28TLctWBbQ0pRys6hvOGlHfh5BmZZX36+A525mzO4uBdvmTkO7yTb8hm6 peIDnjctdNF7NalSs7z87leJzC093A7xBQl2WVtwTyOEbeIe/OKqSHB+2 xRItH7XE0aKzSM/dMS8tE754Lj8xPC513QKkAD0+TKe+r9MZcUUsEFQxZ YdsjH5mrAOwPoGv5bu8jBlxzuXd/xH01xOvdnzXmbTTGf+HSnLwEAttqh w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10245"; a="231333675" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,334,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="231333675" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2022 10:59:31 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,334,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="599312058" Received: from rashmigh-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO intel.com) ([10.252.132.8]) by fmsmga004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2022 10:59:30 -0800 Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 10:59:28 -0800 From: Ben Widawsky To: ira.weiny@intel.com Cc: Dan Williams , Jonathan Cameron , Bjorn Helgaas , Alison Schofield , Vishal Verma , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 09/10] cxl/mem: Retry reading CDAT on failure Message-ID: <20220201185928.ffdgvnn6mcmo7by7@intel.com> References: <20220201071952.900068-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20220201071952.900068-10-ira.weiny@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220201071952.900068-10-ira.weiny@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22-01-31 23:19:51, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote: > From: Ira Weiny > > The CDAT read may fail for a number of reasons but mainly it is possible > to get different parts of a valid state. The checksum in the CDAT table > protects against this. > > Now that the checksum is validated issue a retry if the CDAT read fails. > For now 2 retries are implemented. > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny > > --- > NOTE: Is 2 enough? Should this just be delayed until the time when the > data is actually needed and not there? I can't speak to retries at all, but one small issue below. It might make sense if we keep this to make it a modparam. > > Changes from V5: > New patch -- easy to push off or drop. > --- > drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c > index a01068e98333..11d721c56f08 100644 > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c > @@ -356,7 +356,8 @@ static const struct file_operations cxl_memdev_fops = { > .llseek = noop_llseek, > }; > > -static int read_cdat_data(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds) > +static int __read_cdat_data(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, > + struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds) > { > struct device *dev = &cxlmd->dev; > size_t cdat_length; > @@ -371,6 +372,20 @@ static int read_cdat_data(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds) > return cxl_mem_cdat_read_table(cxlds, &cxlmd->cdat); > } > > +static int read_cdat_data(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, > + struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds) > +{ > + int retries = 2; > + int rc; > + > + while (--retries) { You either want retries--, or retries = 3... > + rc = __read_cdat_data(cxlmd, cxlds); > + if (!rc) > + break; > + } > + return rc; > +} > + > struct cxl_memdev *devm_cxl_add_memdev(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds) > { > struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd; > -- > 2.31.1 >