Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 1 Feb 2022 19:20:14 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To:     Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Improve isolation of
 standalone ports
Message-ID: <20220201172014.v7amuqqksp4jl34x@skbuf>
References: <20220131154655.1614770-1-tobias@waldekranz.com>
 <20220131154655.1614770-2-tobias@waldekranz.com>
 <20220201170634.wnxy3s7f6jnmt737@skbuf>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220201170634.wnxy3s7f6jnmt737@skbuf>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 07:06:34PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Question: can we disable learning per FID? I searched for this in the
> limited documentation that I have, but I didn't see such option.
> Doing this would be advantageous because we'd end up with a bit more
> space in the ATU. With your solution we're just doing damage control.

Answering my own question...

Your patch 4/5 does disable learning for packets coming from standalone
ports, but not by FID, but by VTU policy. So that's good. Reading on...