Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1a4d:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id nk13csp1606154pxb; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:32:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzBIgV6IeVhTL2I1moRKOTtQkTbzc6d94EL72WpQXxUeotkrMGaHcKpxiP+Qnl05qOiRgQc X-Received: by 2002:a63:a102:: with SMTP id b2mr24976542pgf.459.1643819534474; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 08:32:14 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1643819534; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=asDFKr9Zrm/VFZJQd8jq/0N+9DDw88vsEq+XBuYNNn3EYDLPiTxgd7Si6DPveQ8Y5q bdZu66S9fys5XbHyhoIGZ+Pme1IZQj7kuSEWgYfCs8vVRtP5RIUm7Vy1m2LQ7QiKCPvS sOf4xzsy2atPn4BNM6NRGpvpZfwDnHM6xNsOL6LdwTdwcld9zGXFPSkN/jI2Ltpp/pX7 /bUUp+0RSSzkwjfiKgKCbgHCTfEIw2TPeQhIkCw8U8EH2qgdrUYGm7N3kY2jEmdtRwSq 2s1xL2gv0pjbD5L6hYpude39NatJgPi+/yK8cv86hIAAbESjAAhA0SzOskGWYL4INSXY 05xQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:dkim-signature; bh=HsfDWGpmirQwGTRSNLQmFIAkG7JByQa85AM3b1LDm9s=; b=0iKDA3TrbsDpO28PWw3HJveqwcCVLpVUj5y0hOVTN+2gnNTOAaS7ifjsHkEA2dMcWu F9/A0gciaykGXdTqMMwsKlRvZV757S+dMlCE5mJk6zlGkki4QHs45HWx1t+RH3MH49sh QMNJW4LIU5Rj0ZTvnOHekOl3atiaNiQn5zWav0Jh/234IoU43BXJVmI5e8S7CUHyC7Gb hWlZeXEKNnLkMlkBbrWtYEhdZWSf/gCFRRHBsjKQCluJn/mWSj76H6b8827+6AjCjRxl NrqZliFbPmzbyG1Us/WY3AOH/PkTRRVosHlEIT+5h9rxd1VUab8HhapDZ0W82++bU0RQ 7/EQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=CJBxYQNI; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q21si5154597pjd.81.2022.02.02.08.32.01; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 08:32:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=CJBxYQNI; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242025AbiBAWsp (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:48:45 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57014 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241098AbiBAWso (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:48:44 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A7E2C061714; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 14:48:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id g20so16671341pgn.10; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 14:48:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=HsfDWGpmirQwGTRSNLQmFIAkG7JByQa85AM3b1LDm9s=; b=CJBxYQNIX+LlGI+UmRx6JCxuUPoQ7jTBOZzzrt7PdYR/WkLZRWZvXQj3G0f86j/+b6 UXbU0FxuqsspOF5IPtFH6OFpXkbZEwPt8NK/wSkHNf9OyU9cgEqG3luPE28pUZ0L1BBl lhiM199dG1suxWuKlC7TBlGkQIvSt6OVQZsqMz/l1bKYP/qJWEMRNbXAc4w1D8bVngks sgYdJc/royL6aG8SLjFjryd6VtDD3S8E5U1tN+Hxc6fRDDMrayyKiSkVhFLXo1aM+Kk1 kGhFbb5oFGdSUfrW64XdKFsIP7FFFzAmKgZ3/UObVR8WXVzMS/cpiV3oLZwRBhe471b/ Q/XQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=HsfDWGpmirQwGTRSNLQmFIAkG7JByQa85AM3b1LDm9s=; b=cgcQuNOdrF4UCNo3a2QcJ66Dtsjez5zzxrtv9VdSjguYn+neBiMh1JEwEzKI42Jtkz 3jCXUe/Sihz2A3iV6ITpBg9Kf2wuhZD7ben0jLp/dJjMszS3x4WalMgNsd/YRmzp1xXF rCvb4s01d+DS28yPx7TPAKX5AQMMmIVKBDT9JuU7ScprJ7OoGDlXcpIecLtp7jCTBgJC sUFEo5br3KlZVS66kIHm06lBeVd43tut3V2/ltZ8Y6ItO/BYj/YyaPnkYGLyMUQSWZVU BNTWugdlfFsPZRZaKdbGEh0xVftBHuN7TNwUhErCoDrbEo88Tkl4nuhUl6rgcebtN7ay Ua1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531o7K9IVcAWQg2obqnd1A7ZW0j2gRYa/sG8giKm7CRnbccRGHGM Uv4+CnBqZcxmA72mwfpSP34= X-Received: by 2002:a63:5f52:: with SMTP id t79mr22219870pgb.177.1643755723353; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 14:48:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (2603-800c-1a02-1bae-e24f-43ff-fee6-449f.res6.spectrum.com. [2603:800c:1a02:1bae:e24f:43ff:fee6:449f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id nk11sm3743647pjb.55.2022.02.01.14.48.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Feb 2022 14:48:42 -0800 (PST) Sender: Tejun Heo Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 12:48:41 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Roman Gushchin Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Egorenkov , Waiman Long , Johannes Weiner , Shakeel Butt , Jeremy Linton , cgroups@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mm: memcg: synchronize objcg lists with a dedicated spinlock Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 02:33:04PM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote: ... > In this example a slab allocation from __send_signal() caused a > refilling and draining of a percpu objcg stock, resulted in a > releasing of another non-related objcg. Objcg release path requires > taking the css_set_lock, which is used to synchronize objcg lists. > > This can create a circular dependency with the sighandler lock, > which is taken with the locked css_set_lock by the freezer code > (to freeze a task). > > In general it seems that using css_set_lock to synchronize objcg lists > makes any slab allocations and deallocation with the locked > css_set_lock and any intervened locks risky. > > To fix the problem and make the code more robust let's stop using > css_set_lock to synchronize objcg lists and use a new dedicated > spinlock instead. > > Fixes: bf4f059954dc ("mm: memcg/slab: obj_cgroup API") > Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin > Reported-by: Alexander Egorenkov > Tested-by: Alexander Egorenkov > Reviewed-by: Waiman Long > Cc: Tejun Heo > Cc: Johannes Weiner > Cc: Shakeel Butt > Cc: Jeremy Linton > Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Tejun Heo I suppose this will go through -mm? If you want me to route it through the cgroup tree, please let me know. Thanks. -- tejun