Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 1 Feb 2022 15:09:41 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Martin Uecker <Martin.Uecker@med.uni-goettingen.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
        Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/const.h: Explain how __is_constexpr() works
Message-ID: <YflNNRCibwcy7F3Q@casper.infradead.org>
References: <20220131204357.1133674-1-keescook@chromium.org>
 <dc86fdf7-3202-e836-6f71-af1e2458b105@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <dc86fdf7-3202-e836-6f71-af1e2458b105@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 02:05:53PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> I don't think adding slightly inaccurate comments would help a future
> reader at all. Then it's better to just stick to Linus' "it's art, and
> art should not be explained".

/* You are not expected to understand this */