Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1a4d:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id nk13csp1890591pxb; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:08:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6XRZGsm11iOnwr3rYHfH72qNFdsNx2GIGi2qrwnow6mcqZ329rqarc5v65/veTQ7ofhYd X-Received: by 2002:a63:6b04:: with SMTP id g4mr7011654pgc.170.1643843321535; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 15:08:41 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1643843321; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Qb2ZoxYSgkSAZ5e3KNqxZRWJEvcli7rR4PtFIj6XeCinCBa6aaxSjMQdW3KcX1Hf8J kq5yS9HW4eA+CO807kpTd57cuItK8lA+SsGvt1UWC6CCVpcoesJ83KHP21uMLlROiHJe 7tO95HeYU4zF487nbu0RDrDpywojFU1N31KKZSg/vjwZjHqNGHGtcVijwzJiJcrmoyzX 8+zP58xLY/OyJSEKMlnlEAu5ojkT3MTmcgNQvnCmBWHwZ/O6d/UzntZYoPMItNwiDWPg oR5XzILTVZsrU4DH5T6NQ5gK+vqXzkytqnaa1NFKTUOrn3xiw6LuP7xmSRb0XdZa9ox0 YUYQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Eu7UtipXKhJuZYLgqyG2W5R8xjd0BRCq/AEfSVc5hGw=; b=IqvXCDSJfsiITK4TVs8zrA2m58WhRuQq8xk/hgCV3ZzRTSJMKxNxRKjOmEwPYU5e7i Qi5MJzChKmbMg4YHeQ6tyY9QXYpFQhYkrPIVeptxxmDH1uZ+FUjoPEZzs9J3AE9b6vyr atNRVfXuakRA7pZQcsMrUIQ0hY46ByGKWrrPHNkA21vrBfa1YnugPS1Z5XfVUdqs4MF/ cQtdXBWyPy2mBbBD3T3pupg8UlssD4Jb7jHzPfwTrudffsmziJdkB9Zw4XbIV18Db190 ntT4nNrVPPV80Mohq+Ej3XUHj8AA97XyfzcZgN+VLWqqewKcH/m8/wECFdKfnosCfG23 c79w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=hmp1nsoH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k70si20501244pgd.531.2022.02.02.15.08.29; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 15:08:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=hmp1nsoH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345608AbiBBP6j (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:58:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34386 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345611AbiBBP6i (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:58:38 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30C7DC061714 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 07:58:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id z10-20020a17090acb0a00b001b520826011so7241996pjt.5 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 07:58:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Eu7UtipXKhJuZYLgqyG2W5R8xjd0BRCq/AEfSVc5hGw=; b=hmp1nsoHocmtnFFGGz009yO4BoykxPo3j9vOnfcmIMcTHC+cuOHcKvAKDAKcs78lnh zmDUFUpzX0UXrYA7gDHRqHO3Y7D4nF3ECQZnAkxAE3VEYfKLgOfKYZaciZldwXAhMOLH SalflKwf5cGSW4A6qVMDEzhNE4BtO7jbeD7Z7DbPawuWuN5CMNF5g4zbQj/mP2l1Sy+i vakSEHh4WQYsFPCevjt9U0PITcoAPERscIfFRgcyUWwSckWOQ1eX3DOsifIi5pJ6V2ai OqtI0t6hPQbSpzDIuK0yJGcUqoDXEx9Iaqk8XtQt8bxRwo8vhHN4vbOYTjcUI6w5Adun phrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Eu7UtipXKhJuZYLgqyG2W5R8xjd0BRCq/AEfSVc5hGw=; b=HSVAPjIX46qDO+qym3nhO+DFoUNOOajUkHhUo1hSPNHDRCWfTO68I8NuJjiiLnB3JW wkE+r/JuTIrFqqUbIcvBfwjHKhKckN3DUoyvh42SJE4zihDIV2KJgaDQ2KZBzFESd05Z 4+2fjRdYmcY8a8N+LgZgBruWb2ChcjMAv7HdGTw5geV80kpL1e5/2IH8okeYOm+TPZtU kGYvJ7fT6pubE5F+pqkUlzy7MN9dS3hG/1aIYs+FWcVId4/3UuBsdIHokwEaIgWKEp5t 0by5lhK/wBf4N5AASS6F1c2jnmmbGE7Yn6UZJP7qNc2v6fYVGhG7NJku/irx0Mqz/K/b OZzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530d/fRRxVNW6pOj4YyoSUDEmdSAjfsNNxGF0PnRDhav1K+Vy0vf 4WIBE/1p+XiBD10AEjMEvIrLBSWzV1A76Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3b52:: with SMTP id ot18mr8921394pjb.34.1643817517519; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 07:58:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f15sm24958295pfn.19.2022.02.02.07.58.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Feb 2022 07:58:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:58:33 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Suravee Suthikulpanit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, mlevitsk@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, joro@8bytes.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, peterz@infradead.org, hpa@zytor.com, jon.grimm@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] svm: avic: Allow AVIC support on system w/ physical APIC ID > 255 Message-ID: References: <20220202041112.273017-1-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220202041112.273017-1-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 01, 2022, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > Originally, AMD SVM AVIC supports 8-bit host physical APIC ID. > However, newer AMD systems can have physical APIC ID larger than 255, > and AVIC hardware has been extended to support upto 12-bit host > physical APIC ID. > > This series introduces a helper function in the APIC subsystem to get > the maximum physical APIC ID allowing the SVM AVIC driver to calculate > the proper size to program the host physical APIC ID in the AVIC > physical APIC ID table entry. NAK to this version. Please wait until discussion on the previous versions comes to a stop. If a reviewer is non-responsive then that's one thing, but we were literally just discussing this yesterday.