Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 2 Feb 2022 16:20:41 -0800
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To:     Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
        Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc:     cl@linux.com, pmladek@suse.com, mbenes@suse.cz,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, jeyu@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org, atomlin@atomlin.com,
        ghalat@redhat.com, allen.lkml@gmail.com, void@manifault.com,
        joe@perches.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
Message-ID: <Yfsf2SGELhQ71Ovo@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20220130213214.1042497-1-atomlin@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220130213214.1042497-1-atomlin@redhat.com>
Sender: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 09:32:01PM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> Hi Luis,
> 
> As per your suggestion [1], this is an attempt to refactor and split
> optional code out of core module support code into separate components.
> This version is based on branch mcgrof/modules-next since a97ac8cb24a3/or
> modules-5.17-rc1. Please let me know your thoughts.
> 
> Changes since v1 [2]:

Thanks for all this work Aaron! Can you drop the RFC prefix,
rebase onto linus' latest tree (as he already merged my
modules-next, so his tree is more up to date), and submit again?

I'll then apply this to my modules-next, and then ask Christophe to
rebase on top of that.

Michal, you'd be up next if you want to go through modules-next.

Aaron, please Cc Christophe and Michal on your next respin.

Thanks!!

  Luis