Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 22:08:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 22:08:42 -0500 Received: from mx3out.umbc.edu ([130.85.253.53]:49317 "EHLO mx3out.umbc.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 22:08:29 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 22:08:24 -0500 From: John Jasen X-X-Sender: To: J Sloan cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: Which gcc version? In-Reply-To: <3BFEC5DA.ADDDF1BD@pobox.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, J Sloan wrote: > > What are they going to do about gcc 3.0.x? It'll be amusing to watch. > > Not sure you mean "what are they going to do" > since gcc 3.0.x is included in redhat 7.2 - could > you explain about the amusing part? I got into a long argument with someone from Redhat, who suggested that I read too many ./ postings, and gained my opinion of gcc 2.96 as shipped in 7.0 from that. Where my opinion of it was formed by running it on my laptop for T&E for two weeks, and having about a 25% success ratio of compiling code under it. Well, okay ... 50% for compilation, and of that, 50% running without catching on fire. In that conversation, he assured me that RH would take every measure to ensure that future releases were compatible with code generated under 2.96. So, it could be amusing ... -- -- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu) -- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/