Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:34:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:34:02 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:16968 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:33:49 -0500 Subject: Re: RFC: "SubmittingPatches" text To: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 22:04:02 +0000 (GMT) Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200011162132.PAA01944@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com> from "Jeff Garzik" at Nov 16, 2000 03:32:40 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The Unofficial Linus HOWTO 'Care And Operation Of Your Linus Torvalds' > mv linux linux-vanilla > diff -urN linux-vanilla $MYSRC > /tmp/patch Include Tigrans recommended exclude list and info > code. A MIME attachment also takes Linus a bit more time to process, > decreasing the likelihood of your MIME-attached change being accepted. + If your mailer is mangling patches then someone may ask you to resend them + using MIME. Maybe also note that maintainers of given modules are much more likely to give feedback than Linus, also the [PATCH]: convention Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/