Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992754AbXBITAH (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:00:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992756AbXBITAH (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:00:07 -0500 Received: from dsl3-63-249-91-56.cruzio.com ([63.249.91.56]:59221 "EHLO cichlid.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992754AbXBITAG (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:00:06 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 3026 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:00:06 EST Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:09:22 -0800 From: Andrew Burgess Message-Id: <200702091809.l19I9MgS025574@cichlid.com> To: kernel@kolivas.org, ck@vds.kolivas.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Swap prefetch merge plans Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1000 Lines: 20 >I'm stuck developing code I'm having trouble proving it helps. Normal users >find it helps and an artificial testcase shows it helps, but that is not >enough, since the normal users will be tainted in their opinion, and the >artificial testcase will always be artificial. My mistake of developing novel >code in areas that were unquantifiable has been my undoing. Could you add some statistics gathering to measure cumulatively how long processes wait for swapin? Then you could run with and without and maybe say "on average my system waits 4 minutes a day without swap prefetch and 2 minutes with? Or if a simple sum doesn't work, some sort of graph? Then anyone could run and measure the benefit. Apologies if you've already thought of this... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/