Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/exec: Avoid future NULL argv execve warning
To:     Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc:     Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        Ariadne Conill <ariadne@dereferenced.org>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20220201000807.2453486-1-keescook@chromium.org>
 <Yfqfo0rbq/B/l6IP@localhost.localdomain>
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <7af32164-dbdf-26f1-1aaa-b720365f9743@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:38:57 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <Yfqfo0rbq/B/l6IP@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2/2/22 8:13 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 04:08:07PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Build actual argv for launching recursion test to avoid future warning
>> about using an empty argv in execve().
> 
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/exec/recursion-depth.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/exec/recursion-depth.c
>> @@ -24,8 +24,14 @@
>>   #include <sys/mount.h>
>>   #include <unistd.h>
>>   
>> +#define FILENAME "/tmp/1"
>> +#define HASHBANG "#!" FILENAME "\n"
>> +
>>   int main(void)
>>   {
>> +	char * const argv[] = { FILENAME, NULL };
>> +	int rv;
> 
> Can we move out of -Wdeclaration-after-statement mentality in tests at least?

selftest like the rest of the kernel follows the same coding guidelines.
It will follow the moving "-Wdeclaration-after-statement mentality" when
the rest of the kernel does.

Looks like this topic was discussed in the following:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-kbuild/patch/c6fda26e8d134264b04fadc3386d6c32@gmail.com/

thanks,
-- Shuah