Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:35:22 +0100
From:   Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc:     Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] mm: page_isolation: check specified range for
 unmovable pages
Message-ID: <YfqyyiB4HOxjStY/@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20220119190623.1029355-1-zi.yan@sent.com>
 <20220119190623.1029355-4-zi.yan@sent.com>
 <Yfp2rv0K6d3cNmwg@localhost.localdomain>
 <21c196f8-18ca-d720-4241-00c9461854d3@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <21c196f8-18ca-d720-4241-00c9461854d3@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 01:25:28PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> That's the whole idea for being able to allocate parts of an unmovable
> pageblock that are movable.
> 
> If the first part is unmovable but the second part is movable, nothing
> should stop us from trying to allocate the second part.

Yeah, I see, I was a bit slow there, but I see the point now.
 
Thanks David

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs