Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752388AbXBIV5u (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:57:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752446AbXBIV5u (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:57:50 -0500 Received: from nigel.suspend2.net ([203.171.70.205]:40901 "EHLO nigel.suspend2.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752388AbXBIV5u (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:57:50 -0500 Subject: NAK new drivers without proper power management? From: Nigel Cunningham Reply-To: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net To: LKML Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:57:49 +1100 Message-Id: <1171058269.1484.64.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 601 Lines: 18 Hi. I don't think this is already done (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong).. Can we start to NAK new drivers that don't have proper power management implemented? There really is no excuse for writing a new driver and not putting .suspend and .resume methods in anymore, is there? Regards, Nigel-getting-sick-of-drivers-without-pm-support Cunningham - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/