Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423344AbXBIWRX (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:17:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423347AbXBIWRX (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:17:23 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:58732 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423344AbXBIWRW (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:17:22 -0500 Subject: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management? From: Arjan van de Ven To: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <1171058269.1484.64.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> References: <1171058269.1484.64.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 23:17:13 +0100 Message-Id: <1171059433.8675.195.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-3.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 777 Lines: 20 On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 08:57 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > I don't think this is already done (feel free to correct me if I'm > wrong).. > > Can we start to NAK new drivers that don't have proper power management > implemented? There really is no excuse for writing a new driver and not > putting .suspend and .resume methods in anymore, is there? to a large degree, a device driver that doesn't suspend is better than no device driver at all, right? now.. if you want to make the core warn about it, that's very fair - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/