Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:28:30 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <quic_subbaram@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define
 support for name based regulators
Message-ID: <Yfu8XulvWQbpQoBR@sirena.org.uk>
References: <cover.1643069954.git.quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
 <fcd130891cc1d52cb09b8bfc866ab7ef1ce3b2a1.1643069954.git.quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
 <YfREsxeSSX2pbALf@sirena.org.uk>
 <8355035c-6d90-adfd-c4e1-7bb37a2d8055@quicinc.com>
 <YfrBharI91QYkPR1@sirena.org.uk>
 <532aa931-2471-8fb3-0db4-7ab8a60333e8@quicinc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FHEHOoLIGiZXymy0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <532aa931-2471-8fb3-0db4-7ab8a60333e8@quicinc.com>
Precedence: bulk


--FHEHOoLIGiZXymy0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:09:43PM -0800, David Collins wrote:
> On 2/2/22 9:38 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > This seems like a scenario where the DT should be being generated at
> > runtime along with the virtualisation of the platform?  TBH a setup
> > where this is an issue feels like it's asking for trouble.

> I'm not familiar with runtime device tree generation.  Could you please
> point to an example of it or documentation for it?  How would this
> handle kernel devices on the VM side which need a phandle to an
> scmi-regulator DT subnode in order to get a pointer to the corresponding
> regulator device at runtime via devm_regulator_get()?

I believe qemu does this for the virt machine.  I'm not sure what you're
seeing as particularly complex about generating regulator links in
particular though?

--FHEHOoLIGiZXymy0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmH7vF0ACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9DDlQf/YzYI3j06uft9Q3I/6yHQsgA1u1k5QKi5P1/6CCVe1u9jdfsaqOkfERqv
9ccQrebFf9XObnh7/UjdJmQn9+QrDN9iWRah/6relqDKvVBZY8dtsRVhPNnDhr9w
U+GBwujVRrY/F6mVxK2wst8PqsWlxpf8BC12NY52c7fKgF8cm54mEUVNpIBrAGun
9eGAl5GqqfFw0a1FlS3eCzDUmv1ptqI+DWXanrUQLhLejUpfiVwLxQmFqXkOitL5
6uH+oZ8/xYYOHS37NK4nXzVY+uonIvw5AghpXC0c3cGHGqHjTGE6AVlDfkG+9jGW
leW8W1h5fAeK60ebJ7sOibX+OoIU/w==
=xs8h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FHEHOoLIGiZXymy0--