Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946805AbXBJAZp (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:25:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946809AbXBJAZp (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:25:45 -0500 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:33578 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946806AbXBJAZo (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:25:44 -0500 Message-ID: <45CD10FE.3050506@garzik.org> Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:25:34 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070130) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net CC: Arjan van de Ven , LKML Subject: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management? References: <1171058269.1484.64.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> <1171059433.8675.195.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1171059968.1484.90.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> In-Reply-To: <1171059968.1484.90.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.7 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1528 Lines: 42 Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 23:17 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 08:57 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> I don't think this is already done (feel free to correct me if I'm >>> wrong).. >>> >>> Can we start to NAK new drivers that don't have proper power management >>> implemented? There really is no excuse for writing a new driver and not >>> putting .suspend and .resume methods in anymore, is there? >> >> to a large degree, a device driver that doesn't suspend is better than >> no device driver at all, right? > > I'm not sure it is. It only makes more work for everyone else: We have > to help people figure out what causes their computer to fail to resume > (which can take quite a while), then get them them complain to driver > author, and the driver author has to submit patches to fix it. > > All of this is avoided if they'll just do it right in the first place. A lot of a lot of things could have been avoided, if they just did it right the first time. I think it's more valuable to users to get a basic network driver that pings or a basic ATA driver that reads/writes, than peripheral issues like suspend/resume. Certainly we should ask for it, but it shouldn't be a merge-stopper. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/