Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH] soc: qcom: aoss: remove spurious IRQF_ONESHOT flags
Date:   Fri,  4 Feb 2022 12:35:18 -0600
Message-Id: <164399969245.3386915.10497523755309150781.b4-ty@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220127173554.158111-1-daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
References: <20220127173554.158111-1-daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:35:54 +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> Quoting the header comments, IRQF_ONESHOT is "Used by threaded interrupts
> which need to keep the irq line disabled until the threaded handler has
> been run.". When applied to an interrupt that doesn't request a threaded
> irq then IRQF_ONESHOT has a lesser known (undocumented?) side effect,
> which it to disable the forced threading of the irq. For "normal" kernels
> (without forced threading) then, if there is no thread_fn, then
> IRQF_ONESHOT is a nop.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] soc: qcom: aoss: remove spurious IRQF_ONESHOT flags
      commit: 8030cb9a55688c1339edd284d9d6ce5f9fc75160

Best regards,
-- 
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>