Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752971AbXBJDmY (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:42:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752972AbXBJDmY (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:42:24 -0500 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([217.147.92.49]:56643 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752949AbXBJDmY (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:42:24 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 03:42:11 +0000 From: Matthew Garrett To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: LKML Message-ID: <20070210034210.GB16490@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1171058269.1484.64.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1171058269.1484.64.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@codon.org.uk Subject: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management? X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:35:45 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on vavatch.codon.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 657 Lines: 16 On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 08:57:49AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Can we start to NAK new drivers that don't have proper power management > implemented? There really is no excuse for writing a new driver and not > putting .suspend and .resume methods in anymore, is there? The PCI layer is able to deal with drivers that have no PM methods in the most simple case. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/