Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 4 Feb 2022 15:17:02 -0800 (PST)
From:   "Kenneth R. Crudup" <kenny@panix.com>
Reply-To: "Kenneth R. Crudup" <kenny@panix.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
cc:     Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>, bhelgaas@google.com,
        lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
        wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
        kai.heng.feng@canonical.com, chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz,
        yangyicong@hisilicon.com, treding@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        abhsahu@nvidia.com, sagupta@nvidia.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kthota@nvidia.com,
        mmaddireddy@nvidia.com, sagar.tv@gmail.com,
        "Kenneth R. Crudup" <kenny@panix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] PCI/ASPM: Save/restore L1SS Capability for
 suspend/resume
In-Reply-To: <20220204230234.GA226601@bhelgaas>
Message-ID: <7b377c19-23-6793-5e43-b757cfd8437@panix.com>
References: <20220204230234.GA226601@bhelgaas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

> Do we have a theory on what might have caused the regression before?
> Or at least something that is different this time around?

If you'd like, I could try re-applying the previous problem commit or your
attempted fix on top of Linus' master if you'd like to see if something was
fixed somewhere else in the PCIe subsystem, but if you think it's not worth-
while I'm satisfied with the current fix (or probably more-exactly for my
particular machine, lack of regression).

	-Kenny

-- 
Kenneth R. Crudup / Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Orange County CA