Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220201222845.3640041-1-jeffreyji@google.com> <20220202205916.58f4a592@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220202205916.58f4a592@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
From:   Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Feb 2022 10:05:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMzD94SNEPACnp+uniXVgRDWr9oukj-xnAoqyQQCE77GH_kqdg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next] net-core: add InMacErrors counter
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     Jeffrey Ji <jeffreyjilinux@gmail.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        jeffreyji <jeffreyji@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 8:59 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue,  1 Feb 2022 22:28:45 +0000 Jeffrey Ji wrote:
> > From: jeffreyji <jeffreyji@google.com>
> >
> > Increment InMacErrors counter when packet dropped due to incorrect dest
> > MAC addr.
> >
> > An example when this drop can occur is when manually crafting raw
> > packets that will be consumed by a user space application via a tap
> > device. For testing purposes local traffic was generated using trafgen
> > for the client and netcat to start a server
> >
> > example output from nstat:
> > \~# nstat -a | grep InMac
> > Ip6InMacErrors                  0                  0.0
> > IpExtInMacErrors                1                  0.0
>
> I had another thing and this still doesn't sit completely well
> with me :(
>
> Shouldn't we count those drops as skb->dev->rx_dropped?
> Commonly NICs will do such filtering and if I got it right
> in struct rtnl_link_stats64 kdoc - report them as rx_dropped.
> It'd be inconsistent if on a physical interface we count
> these as rx_dropped and on SW interface (or with promisc enabled
> etc.) in the SNMP counters.
> Or we can add a new link stat that NICs can use as well.
>
> In fact I'm not sure this is really a IP AKA L3 statistic,
> it's the L2 address that doesn't match.
>
>
> If everyone disagrees - should we at least rename the MIB counter
> similarly to the drop reason? Experience shows that users call for
> help when they see counters with Error in their name, I'd vote for
> IpExtInDropOtherhost or some such. The statistic should also be
> documented in Documentation/networking/snmp_counter.rst

Changing the Name to IpExtInDropOtherhost and adding the documentation
makes sense to me. What do others think? I'd like to get more feedback
before Jeffrey sends another version.